I suspect John's answer will be
1) because it's cool to try new things
2) because I want to limit the destruction if it goes wrong.
Waiting for the real answer,
Rob
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 6:22 PM Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:57:38 -0500 John McKown <
>
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 08:57:38 -0500 John McKown
wrote:
:>I am not finding this. I want to change the PKM for my running, APF
:>authorized, program to include key 0. Why? So that I can switch in and out
:>of key 0 using an SPKA instruction rather than MODESET. But mainly so that
:>I can use the
Thanks. I'll try that next time I'm mucking there. I'm in the process of
reipling all the systems now to verify that the dynamic changes I made today
stick after an IPL.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieae200/ieae200140.htm
The following syntax rules apply to COUPLExx:
Use columns 1 through 71. Do not use columns 72 - 80 for data; these
columns are ignored.
At least one delimiter (space or comma) is required between a
I'm enabling several optional functions in my COUPLExx parmlib member, and they
all don't fit on one line. During IPL it's complaining if I have multiple
FUNCTIONS ENABLE statements in the member, and I can't get the syntax right for
it to read the options across multiple lines.
What's the
Message says
If appropriate, grant the user the authority required to use the specified name
for a software instance on the specified system. For information about
controlling user authorizations, see the topic on creating access controls for
the Software Management task in IBM z/OS Management
