Hi Steve,
Yes, I have since been told and indeed it works.
My problem was not knowing that initially, plus basing myself on the online
documentation example, which indeed shows both download and upload icons next
to the member name in the ZOWE explorer window.
So, all's working. Thanks.
-
Greetings and Happy New Year to you!
We are pleased to confirm that the next meeting of the GSE UK Security Working
Group, will take place on Thursday 6th February 2020 at the offices of SAS in
Bishopsgate, Central London. Registration is open, which you can access via our
Events page > http://
Although I have no personal expereince, a couple of points you should be aware
of:
1. You also need a couple of H/W feature codes 9930 and 6802 (to use zIIPs
for SRB)for the z15 for use of SRB. FC 9930 for a contract to use this function.
2. You can use SRB for sub-capacity CPs and if usi
SVA does that in Germany for other customers.
https://www.sva.de/en/index.html
I am neither employee nor associated with that company.
-Original Message-
From: Pranshu Singh
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Thu, Jan 9, 2020 1:52 pm
Subject: Need Mainframe as a Service
Hi All
My customer is looking
File-Save works for me.
From: "Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD."
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 01/06/2020 08:15 AM
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: ZOWE Open Editor - baby's first steps
questions
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
OK, I have an error somewhere.
I asked
It sounded like good stuff in the ISV NDA meeting. Clever idea. (I guess
that is okay to say out of school!)
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Feller, Paul
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 11:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LI
By the end of the month we will have a z15 running. Most of the lpars on the
box will be running z/OS 2.3. It looks like the boost feature will be active
by default for the z/OS 2.3 lpars. Anyone have any comments about the boost
feature good/bad that they will share.
Thanks..
Paul Feller
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, at 17:04, Charles Mills wrote:
> I am not an applications guy, and I didn't do any applications Y2K
> remediation, so I am not an expert, but it would seem to me that if I
> had used windowing I would have based the window on the current date --
> today minus 80 years or some
It all depends on where you use the windowing. If for terseness on
data entry for internal conversion to 4-digit years and retention as
4-digit years, then a floating window relative in some way to current
year is the obvious and only rational choice.
If you elected to retain the date as a
In article <02331572-ae6a-e896-0023-9bd6e64cf...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:23:51 +1100, Attila Fogarasi
> wrote abour Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools:
> > There is a 64-bit ODBC driver so Db2 does provide a 64 bit API today, just
> > not for embedded SQL :)
>
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:23:51 +1100, Attila Fogarasi
wrote abour Re: Enterprise COBOL 6.3 and IBM Programmer Tools:
> There is a 64-bit ODBC driver so Db2 does provide a 64 bit API today, just
> not for embedded SQL :)
The ODBC driver runs on the client machine, not the host. The host
interface is
I am not an applications guy, and I didn't do any applications Y2K remediation,
so I am not an expert, but it would seem to me that if I had used windowing I
would have based the window on the current date -- today minus 80 years or
something like that -- so that it would never fail (in this way
I always preferred to describe a 100-year windowed two-digit year
representation by its lowest or "base" year, in this case 1920 -- just
easier for me to visualize the 100 continguous years of validity on a
timeline..
One would hope those who chose the fixed-windowing temporary solution to
Y
https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-y2k-bug-is-back-causing-headaches-for-developers-again/?ftag=TRE-03-10aaa6b&bhid=21203266192019599533914397741980
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
We may have a local partner who could provide a reference or be able to provide
mainframe software as a service - jeanne.gl...@virtualzcomputing.com.
On 1/9/20, 7:05 AM, "IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Parwez Hamid"
wrote:
Try:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/ur
Do they sing the Lumberjack song ,lol . Yes, people generalizations are a
lot of times wrong ...
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 11:19 PM Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
> Let's not generalize but I know that all accountants want to be
> lumberjacks.
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 7:11 AM Tomasz Rola wrote:
>
> > O
LzLab runs via the web , secondly I think they do host, I know some folks
there.
Parwez, not much into cheap solutions , I live by ‘buy cheap get cheap’ ..
Good luck
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 8:19 AM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Lalab is not a hosting service and a huge conversion is required...
>
> ב
Lalab is not a hosting service and a huge conversion is required...
בתאריך יום ה׳, 9 בינו׳ 2020, 15:10, מאת scott Ford :
> Have the looked at LzLab
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 8:05 AM Parwez Hamid
> wrote:
>
> > Try:
> >
> > https://www.ensono.com/uk
> >
> > PS: I am not assosciated in anyway wi
The Q was about 'mainframe as a service' in London. I don't think LzLab run
one, expecially in London (or anywhere else??). They are more about 'migrating'
apps off the MF. Happy to be corrected.
Regards
Parwez Hamid
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on beh
On 2020-01-09 1:12 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
(We also use a internal python wrapper that starts x3270 through an ssh
tunnel with passticket automation automatically login to TSO without a
password. x3270's api works great with that kind of thing.)
I'm curious to hear more details from those who thi
Have the looked at LzLab
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 8:05 AM Parwez Hamid
wrote:
> Try:
>
> https://www.ensono.com/uk
>
> PS: I am not assosciated in anyway with this company!
>
> Regards
>
> Parwez Hamid
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> of Pran
Try:
https://www.ensono.com/uk
PS: I am not assosciated in anyway with this company!
Regards
Parwez Hamid
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Pranshu Singh
Sent: 09 January 2020 12:42
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Need Mainframe as a S
Hi All
My customer is looking for a mainframe as a service option ( kind of a
cloud) model for hosting its ~900 mips in London. Customer would migrate
everything to such an organisation and would Pay a monthly price. Anything
Non IBM, Non Sungard.
Does anybody know any non IBM, Non Sungard organi
Dave,
What model 3174?
Joe
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 2:09 AM Dave Wade wrote:
> Gentle Folks,
>
>
>
> I have a 3174 with Config C6 configured to connect via TN3270 to various
> mainframes including the 43361 at LCM+L. I have two non-IBM terminals
> connected. A NOKIA and Memorex Telex and both wi
Sri,
stunning as usual !
ICETOOL is really terrific . and I've learnt much more (CHANGE for
instance).
Thanks a lot.
Max
Il giorno gio 9 gen 2020 alle ore 02:16 Sri h Kolusu
ha scritto:
> > Please "light us" with the trick.
>
> Max,
>
> Here is the trick job I was talking about. Basically
Gentle Folks,
I have a 3174 with Config C6 configured to connect via TN3270 to various
mainframes including the 43361 at LCM+L. I have two non-IBM terminals
connected. A NOKIA and Memorex Telex and both with UK layout converged
keyboards.
Both exhibit the same problem. The GA23-0332 User Refer
26 matches
Mail list logo
