>We ran a mixture of TCP and SNA NJE for a long, long time and then
>eventually (by accident in fact) ended up with an OSA hardware
>configuration that could no longer support SNA. We couldn't use EE
>because both ends of the connection were not MVS. So we capitulated and
>changed everything over t
Yes.
בתאריך יום ו׳, 18 בספט׳ 2020, 8:58, מאת Peter :
> IEALPAxx and LPALSTxx treated in same way ?
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep, 2020, 9:44 am Seymour J Metz, wrote:
>
> > You can search an LPA module with IPCS.
> >
> > In addition to the SETPROG command there's the CSVDYLPA macro.
> >
> >
> > --
>
IEALPAxx and LPALSTxx treated in same way ?
On Fri, 18 Sep, 2020, 9:44 am Seymour J Metz, wrote:
> You can search an LPA module with IPCS.
>
> In addition to the SETPROG command there's the CSVDYLPA macro.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
> __
You can search an LPA module with IPCS.
In addition to the SETPROG command there's the CSVDYLPA macro.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Peter
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020
Peter,
To load into dynamic lpa use setprog,add,modname=
To test if already loaded use d prog,lpa,modname=
There are macro calls for both if you want to do that from a program.
ITschak
בתאריך יום ו׳, 18 בספט׳ 2020, 6:43, מאת Peter :
> Hello
>
> Is there any utility which can help to sear
Hello
Is there any utility which can help to search the loaded MLPA module ? Is
it possible to load MLPA dynamically by avoiding IPL?(apology if this a
ignorant question)
We have a product which loads via MLPA and we just trying to understand if
it's possible to load it dynamically without the n
Users probably need read access to mcat so they can access SYS1.MACLIB and
others like it.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 5:06 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: How get a user
Gil,
No documentation at all. Merely trial and error observation. A few years ago
I had good business reasons to use z/OS awk for a research project for my
employer and found that it works using "classic" datasets for both input and
output. Whether it was INTENDED by IBM to do so is a questi
For my money, the quickest and most reliable way to find the 'latest PTF' of a
load module is to use the PDS command or its progeny StarTool. Select the
member you want to query in its load library. For example, we're currently
working on module AMAPDUPL In MIGLIB. Use the 'HISTORY' subcommand:
Maybe I need a make-up class at Saturday morning vocab class. Then again maybe
it's a distinction without a difference. Here's why you do *not* want to
over-grant update access to the master catalog.
-- For the average user, there should be some user catalog pointed to by an
alias in mcat. The
I did not intend to start a storm of messages here.
I was simply using the IBM definition of system integrity which they document
here,
https://www.ibm.com/it-infrastructure/z/capabilities/system-integrity
Yes, maybe it is semantics. But many working in IBM mainframe security
community would dis
How does the interpretation of Peter Farley's question depend on anybody's
definition of support except Peter's. Only if IBM asked the question would
IBM's definition be relevant.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Main
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:17:35 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>It may depend on how you define support. There are some utilities that work
>but for which the documentation doesn't mention it. The DD: recognition is
>unsupported in the sense that if it breaks IBM will not consider that an error.
>
It
Bill,
check the 2nd post in this topic by Galina
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bit.listserv.ibm-main/2wlNViP1ndc
Thanks,
Kolusu
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...
I have been trying to get the Web Enablement Toolkit for z/OS working using a
sample from SYS1.SAMPLIB member name HWTHXRX1. But I am getting an error
message :
HTTP Web Enablement Toolkit Sample Begin
*ERROR* (hwthconn) at time: 11:59:15
**
David,
What are you trying to accomplish with this program or set of programs ?
A little more verb age would be great.
Scott
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 5:53 AM David Spiegel
wrote:
> No.
>
>
>
> On 2020-09-16 23:18, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> > JTIP is more of an unsupported SAPI; it doesn't do w
Not if by prior you mean lower number. The safe thing to do is to query the
status of the PTF you're concerned with.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thurs
It may depend on how you define support. There are some utilities that work but
for which the documentation doesn't mention it. The DD: recognition is
unsupported in the sense that if it breaks IBM will not consider that an error.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
_
It's common for IBM to release multiple fixing PTFs for a single APAR, where
the PTFs address essentially the same problem/function in multiple releases.
This is often the case when two or more PTFs are close in numerical sequence.
The best answer is found in IBM ServiceLink function SIS, which
That depends on the type of access they have and on the dataset profiles. The
part about filling up the MC, of course, applies regardless.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve
>>> Note that I changed your EQ to GE. So it would stop after reading no
> more than 1001 irrelevant records, much improving the performance
> for the OP's "very large" SORTIN. Note also that the OP said SORTIN
> had previously been sorted, so no records having key LT,'ABC' would
> precede the d
Bill,
If UI70029 supercedes UI69028, then yes, the code correction in UI69028 is
included.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 9:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] MEPL showing
Im sorry I was joking about AWK and especially SED
thought there are people who would do it :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 12:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: COBOL ? Re:
Classification: HCL Internal
Would you allow random updates of the ROOT directory on a *NIX system?. This is
definitely both a integrity and an operational exposure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 11:14
There's not much benefit to debating the semantics of "integrity". Nobody
who doesn't thoroughly understand catalog management should be able to
update the master catalog, because you can easily destroy the system by
removing critical dataset entries. Much more typically, it just fills up
with ju
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:58:44 +, Farley, Peter x23353
wrote:
>Of course that is an option, particularly the COBOL one. I am personally very
>familiar with awk and z/OS awk does support "classic" datasets via DD, ...
>
Citation needed. According to what IBM document?
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 0
I could damage the catalog, perhaps as easily as adding datasets until I
overflow it. Perhaps not integrity as in ability to upgrade my authority, but
certainly a potential DOS and a threat to system stability.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Le
PTF numbers are assigned in increasing order, but there's no real guarantee
that reflects the order they apply in.
In addition to Mark Jacobs' advice, you can also just list the sysmod
you're interested in; as it could have been SUPed and not show up directly
on the MOD entry.
sas
On Thu, Sep 1
Our DR vendor just upgraded their mainframe (upgraded a z13 to a z14) ... when
we recover our system we restore our z/VM 7.1 system first and then restore our
z/OS 2.2 system as a guest under our VM. We have been debating whether we need
to do the Required Service that a FIXCAT report produces
> Can you set an a priori upper bound on the number of 'ABC' records?
> Suppose you're confident that there are at most 1000.
Gil,
Unfortunately that wouldn't work. If your input have less than 1000
records for the key 'ABC' and you code STOPAFT=1001, then it would read the
entire file as we di
Of course that is possible, and it is an option that I am aware of. It's just
not as immediately usable as a control-card-only solution would be.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Christopher Y. Blaicher
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 8:28
Of course that is an option, particularly the COBOL one. I am personally very
familiar with awk and z/OS awk does support "classic" datasets via DD, but very
few other programmers in the shop would know how to use it, or support it in my
absence.
And an E15 exit is always a possibility. I wa
On 9/16/2020 10:21 PM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
Thanks, Brian,
This is almost always a problem with the VTAM definition of the NJE applid that
you are using. Possibly you didn't start it or it was started before VTAM or
JES was ready for it to be started.
The NJE/TCP connection method should wor
Unfortunately, no IBM FM here. CA FM is here and might be an option. Its
performance has been adequate for programming needs, but I have not put it to
the test on the really big files.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter Van Dyke
Sent: Wed
Indeed, Rexx is an option but not the fastest tool in the box. And I don't know
about sed but z/OS awk (perhaps not intentionally) does indeed support
"classic" datasets via DD.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, S
Execute a batch SMP/e job;
LIST MOD(modname) XREF.
That'll list all the PTFS and such that touched that module.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Messa
If I want to know if a given PTF is applied to a specific module, such as
UI69028, but I see UI70029. Does that mean prior PTFs are included?
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send ema
For the current TCB, I want to extract the thread id.
I'm using BPX1GTH.
I'm varying the values for PGTHACCESSID and PGAACCESSTHID.
When I get zeros for return value, return code and reason code, the thread id
is always 0.
I'm wondering if this is the right approach.
If it is, what values are ne
No, its because the process uses java...
Joe
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 7:57 AM kekronbekron <
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I could be *completely* wrong .. so ... will wait for the list to correct
> me.
> Think this could be because TCP/IP is built 'in' USS, and theref
I could be *completely* wrong .. so ... will wait for the list to correct me.
Think this could be because TCP/IP is built 'in' USS, and therefore the ShopZ
job, which probably does HTTPS to IBM, needs to get its stuff into USS.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, September 17, 202
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 05:42:35 -0500, Bill Giannelli wrote:
>When I order software maintenance and download it, why does it need to go to
>USS first?
>thanks
>
o If uses tools such as pax for which classic MVS has no equivalent.
o The SMPNTS contains a variety of data organization beyond
the cap
Because of the trend to regress...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 5:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMPe ptfs download to USS
** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
When I order software mai
Because that is how they built the process
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 1:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMPe ptfs download to USS
When I order software maintenance and download it, why
When I order software maintenance and download it, why does it need to go to
USS first?
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
No.
On 2020-09-16 23:18, Seymour J Metz wrote:
JTIP is more of an unsupported SAPI; it doesn't do what SDSF does. Various
versions of Wylbur supported it as an alternative SPOOL access. Do you have a
batch version of Wylbur at your shop?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
https://eur03.safelinks.pr
Dave,
Sorry, but I actually disagree with Master catalog access being an integrity
issue.
I would classify it as a security issue rather than an integrity issue.
The normal controls on the operating system are working correctly and are not
being bypassed, so I don't see that as an integrity iss
46 matches
Mail list logo
