On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 19:10, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> IBM had color support for DIDOCS, ISPF and XEDIT pretty early. I don't recall
> when GDDM picked up color support.
Very early 1980s - earlier than I remember support for DIDOCS or ISPF.
And almost certainly GDDM was under development in
We are not currently using AT-TLS for FTP.
We are currently activating TLSv1.2 support with the following environment
variable:
GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2=1
This works fine and allows us to use (default) cipherspec 35:
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (FU1330 tlsLevel: using TLSV1.2 with
For some reason, people insist on calling a CRT with an amber phosphor a green
screen. IBM probably had color devices for the military or for process control
before the 3279, but I know of no commercial color CRT terminal before it.
IBM had color support for DIDOCS, ISPF and XEDIT pretty early.
Even Jove nods. I'll never object to someone looking over my shoulder if they
actually know what they're doing. We all see what we expect to see, and
sometimes a second pair of eyes will spot something obvious that's been staring
us in the face all along.
That said, I agree that an incompetent
https://en.wikipedia..org/wiki/IBM_3270#3279
1979
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Colours on screen (mainframe
My first color terminal was a 3279 in the early 1980s. I think we had both a
model 2 and model 3. I don't recall if they had the extended color feature.
As far as I know the IBM 3279 was IBMs first color terminal.
Thanks..
Paul Feller
GTS Mainframe Technical Support
-Original
Simple question:
As we know "green terminal" is colorful.
For me it was "always" colorful, because I started with colorful CRT
display.
However it raises question: when the colours were introduced?
I mean ISPF, but it can be any other application, like MVS console or
z/VM XEDIT, whatever.
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:51:18 -0500, Steve Smith wrote:
>Which is at the bottom of every post to the list. Evidently to no avail.
>
>On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 1:31 PM Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>>
>> Note that this is not the 'regular' address for posting.
>>
LISTSERV ought to mark that up as an
Which is at the bottom of every post to the list. Evidently to no avail.
sas
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 1:31 PM Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
> Send this note to
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Send this note to
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Note that this is not the 'regular' address for posting.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team
Most IT auditors I've dealt with recently cut their IT teeth on non-mainframe
platforms and have no clue as to how the mainframe works. Therefore, they push
for rules that are silly, limit productivity, and even create exposures that
don't exist on the mainframe. Even the young one I worked
I think you have to send an email to the list server - something about NOMAIL,
but you can try send an email to mailto:lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
Worry more
Are you saying there was . PHAR MOR going on than met the eyes?
Chris Hoelscher
Lead Sys DBA
IBM Global Technical Services on assignmemt to Humana Inc.
T 502.476.2538 or 502.407.7266
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Johnson
Sent: Tuesday,
Nice story. However I think the discussion is limited to IT status auditing.
ITschak
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring
for z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM coming soon *
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 6:49 PM Bill Johnson <
I worked for a company 30 years ago that at the time was part of the largest
fraud in corporate history. The CEO and executives had 2 sets of books. The
auditors were actively involved with the fraud. Anyone who has been around for
a few decades remembers that a number of the big 6 auditing
I actually would rather have the IBM folks come in and perform their Health
check. We had a team of IBM folks come onsite a couple of years ago to perform
a checkup, I didn't like the fact our leadership had NO FAITH in me and my team
to have the systems built and configured correctly . we
W dniu 23.02.2021 o 00:44, Radoslaw Skorupka pisze:
W dniu 21.02.2021 o 19:55, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 18:23:03 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
...
When the only tool you've mastered is printscreen, everything
looks like a bitmap.
That was the requirement: to make
Your faux auditors may be a RPITA, but a *qualified* auditor is a joy forever,
should you be so fortunate as to be audited by one. They will find things that
actually do need fixing, and will make it easier to get management buy-in for
what needs to be done.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
I'm not sure what you are asking. There is nothing special about low level
qualifiers, and a symbol is a symbol no matter where it occurs.
If you're asking about a catalog alias, that's a high level qualifier by
default, or multiple qualifiers, not never a LLQ. If you really are asking
about
In my case that is true, the Auditor works for another Health care company,
their parent company are HITRUST Cert Auditors, so these folks are not true
auditors, they are hired to guarantee HITRUST certification.
they do not know what an emulator is or have the need or desire to logon and
System wide?
you can display the current symbols via SDSF SYM command or the console
command, D SYMBOLS,
there's a utility program to allow you to set or change symbols,
//A EXEC PGM=IEASYMU2,PARM='STRNAME=(4:1)'
for example
this is just one way to set or change static symbols
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:10:01 -0600, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>how do I display and change the system symbolic for the alias "suffix" (.A .B)?
>thanks
>Bill
>
As long as you are on z/OS V2R1 or later, you can either use SETLOAD xx,IEASYM
command or the IEASYMU2 program.
how do I display and change the system symbolic for the alias "suffix" (.A .B)?
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
23 matches
Mail list logo
