Take a look at
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=requirements-processor-storage-amount
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 8:37 PM Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
> I'm trying to arrange my knowledge about CPU and RAM limits.
>
> Example: current z/OS has limit up to 4 TB of memory. Older versions
>
>> - Holddata are ftp-Links only. And I want to download holddata without
>> ordering anything via ShopZ.
>Not true. You want the IBM HOLDDATA without using FTP? Use SMP/E
>RECEIVE ORDER and indicate downloadmethod="https".
We have never used that here, so I'll check into it when IE goes away.
Really, what is the security risk of FTPS? I know it seems to be increasingly
considered a problem, but why?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 8:03 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re:
Wouldn't it make more sense to ask IBM to provide SFTP-SSH servers rather than
FTP servers, given the concern with security?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on
Compared to IBMs new doc site Adobe is a work of art!
> On 15 Apr 2021, at 10:57 am, kekronbekron
> <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> Adobe is phenomenally bloated for just reading PDFs.
>>
>> "just"? Does it do nothing else?
>
>
> Sorry, I could have
Been a long time since my site locked us out of ftp:// from a browser, a hard
fight I fought but seeing I am allowed to use https via z/OS and can receive
all holddata in a batch job the ability to ftp from the browser is not a issue
for me.
Carmen Vitullo
-Original
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 07:56:14 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>>Anyone else having trouble downloading this zip file?
>>
>>ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/eserver/zseries/zos/alert/PTFList.zip
>
>another ftp-Link from IBM. My company hat decided that ftp is globally
>forbidden, ...
>
Has Kurt Q. any comment
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:34:58 +, Richards, Robert B. (CTR)
wrote:
>Hi Mark!
>
>
>
>In this notification and the one below, IBM makes no distinction between
>RECEIVE methods. Under normal circumstances, I use RECEIVE ORDER on a daily
>basis. I did get the following notification from IBM's
Been using it for at least 30 years.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 10:39 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
IMHO it's legitimate to make an on topic reference to your products in response
to a post. That's not the same as spamming the list.
I wonder how many
IMHO it's legitimate to make an on topic reference to your products in response
to a post. That's not the same as spamming the list.
I wonder how many subscribers are not already aware of QuickRef?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
We did save our ptfs that were received during this time (41 ptfs) of which 9
were applied. This maintenance was on multiple systems spread over 3 sysplexs.
That made doing reapply's not a very desirable idea. We rejected the 41 ptfs
and received them again. Then we used GIMCPTS to expand both
It is common for nannyware to block legitimate sites while allowing access to
sites that you'd rather your children not view.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on
Maybe Computer Museum have it.
Carlos Bodra
IBM zEnterprise Certified
São Paulo – SP – Brazil
-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Em nome de W
Mainframe
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 15 de abril de 2021 11:11
Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Assunto: Old 3278 terminal
Guys,Does anyone in Brazil have an old 3278 terminal (running) for donation or
selling?Thank youDan
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I truly hesitate to offer replies like this, but occasionally it seems
appropriate to potentially resolve an issue. There is a company,
Chicago-Soft, Ltd, for which I work, who offers a product MVS/QuickRef.
QuickRef, among other things (and there are many more), contains tons of
documentation
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:59:26 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>> - Holddata are ftp-Links only. And I want to download holddata without
>> ordering anything via ShopZ.
>Not true. You want the IBM HOLDDATA without using FTP? Use SMP/E
>RECEIVE ORDER and indicate downloadmethod="https".
>
Wrong!
+1 I use HTTPS method weekly in a batch job to receive HOLDDATA only.
at my site, from the mainframe systems that's the only method that is allowed.
I have the sample JCL that IBM provided years ago to do this, easily found on
the IBM site
Carmen Vitullo
-Original
- Holddata are ftp-Links only. And I want to download holddata without ordering anything via ShopZ.
Not true. You want the IBM HOLDDATA without using FTP? Use SMP/E
RECEIVE ORDER and indicate downloadmethod="https".
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
Chuck Norris never uses CHECK
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hello RACF Administrators,
I was hoping that someone could confirm if the website below is what should
be used to download the RACF utility load modules?
https://github.com/IBM/IBM-Z-zOS/tree/master/zOS-RACF/Downloads
The z/OS V2R3 Security Server RACF System Programmer's Guide references
I'm trying to arrange my knowledge about CPU and RAM limits.
Example: current z/OS has limit up to 4 TB of memory. Older versions
(down to 1.8) also had that limit, but older machines had limit for LPAR
memory - up to 1 TB. This time it is not so easy to say what generation,
because LPAR
While I agree ftp links should be changed to https, I would remind a
browser is not necessary to use ftp, it's really easy to circumvent it.
In Windows system there is something called cmd.exe or CLI and there is
a command named ftp.
Of course the link need to be pasted here, but it is quite
>We have ftp blocked at the corporate level. Has anyone found an HTTPS link to
>download this file? I used 'Contact IBM' at the bottom to inquire but not
>optimistic.
You're not the only one. Now that the 'modern browsers' don't support ftp in
websites anymore, I wonder if IBM will wake up
23 matches
Mail list logo
