The problem I have with COND= is that it's back-asswards. First, it
specifies conditions to NOT run the step. You have to keep in mind that
with multiple conditions, any TRUE condition means don't run the step.
Except for ONLY & EVEN, which specify conditions for which the step *will*
run.
You just did.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Nai, Dean
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 11:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Crypto
Would this be a good place to ask some Z14 crypto questions I'm having
IMHO there is no better place.
Ask.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
(looking for new job)
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 24.05.2021 o 20:22, Nai, Dean pisze:
Would this be a good place to ask some Z14 crypto questions I'm having a
problem with?
Seems like a good place to me.
Eric Rossman, CISSP®
ICSF Cryptographic Security Development
z/OS Enabling Technologies
edros...@us.ibm.com
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
05/24/2021 02:22:37 PM:
> From: "Nai, Dean"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 05/24/2021 02:22 PM
> Subject:
Gil,
I attach a discussion about the IF/THEN vs COND= we had in 2011.
That COND= BTW was for a real case of a chemical company running its
payroll 100+ step job on our mainframe, but with a COND=(4,LT) on its
job card. Each time one of its jobsteps hit a CC GT 4, the job ended and
the ops
Mark, If you have not done so, you can ask questions like this on the MXG
List Free to join
www.mxg.com
Probably audience there may have code to share
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steely.Mark
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 11:02 AM
To:
Would this be a good place to ask some Z14 crypto questions I'm having a
problem with?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Then chances are that there's an existing program close to your reporting
requirements.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steely.Mark
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 2:01 PM
To:
Yes - we have MXG
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 12:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CBT - SMF
ATTENTION: This e-mail came from an external source. Do not open attachments or
click on links
What data are you lookimg for? DAF is for DASD; there are other tools for, e.g,
CPU.
Do you have MXG?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steely.Mark
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021
There was a SMF program which I downloaded from CBT along time ago. This SMF
program had parms you could provide. The report would provide a lot of job
information.
I thought it was DAF - but that doesn't look like what I remember.
I have seen it mention here before but I was unable to find it.
I am looking for an api to collect TWS configuration (anything that reads
from parmlib parmlib). The APIs I reviewed are for management. Tx for your
ideas.
ITschak
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring
for z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM coming
Nathen, what's all this callin abaat broad Yorkshire?
Wayne and a few others may understand this.
Mike Wawiorko
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the
addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. If you are not
13 matches
Mail list logo
