You can call you program anything you want and create a command table entry for
it. That way you can leave IBM's submit where it was/is is SYS1.CMDLIB.
i.e. (look in option 3.9 of ISPF) and add
YourCMD SELECT PGM(yourPGM PRM('&ZPARM')) NEWAPPL(anything)
Then when the user ty
Have a look at ISPF 3.9 (COMMAND). This is the command table where you
define new primary commands to ISPF. At end, copy table ISPCMDS (or ISRCMDS
depending on your APPL id) to the first dataset in ISPTLIB concatanation to
make it public to all users.
As per your second question, There are commands
Hello
When I added virtual volume in RMM, I don't see the TCDB getting updated.
Is there any parameter I need to change?
zOS 2.4
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@
Just a guess
But look at SYS1.PARMLIB member IKJTSOxx
Or use the TSO Command
PARMLIB
To see where it exists, what member it is, and what the contents are
You might need to set up something in this member AUTHCMD AUTHPGM etc...
Is the module a TSO Command Processor?
https://www.ibm.com/do
Hi,
I need help to figure out how to add a new Primary Command to ISPF Edit,
so that I can test a RYO SUBMIT Command written in Assembler.
Let's assume that my module is called $UBMIT (with an ALIAS of $UB).
I do not want to write an Edit Macro to do this. (I already wrote one of
these). nor do
Ok (probably just for me), so you're saying the two scripts below work
quite differently from each other? I always assumed all ADDRESS did was
save someone from having to type ISPEXEC over and over. I think you're
saying the statements after ADDRESS actually run under control of ISPF
instead
You invoke ISPF. You call a REXX script for ISPF. The script does ADDRESS
ISPEXEC foo and ISPF gets control back. It's well documented in the TSO/E REXX
Reference, and other implementations have essentially the same API. Basically,
when a REXX-aware application creates an environment, REXX assoc
Maybe I'm missing a subtlety here but can you demonstrate how REXX uses
callbacks on z/OS? I'm familar with command environments, I've written
one for REXX regex https://github.com/daveyc/RTK. In Python, Lua etc you
would just create an instance of a class an communicate using message
passing l
I don't see anything there about dealing with the equivalent of REXX
environments and variable access by both caller and callee.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on be
That looks like the standard Perl infrastructure for interfacing to C. How does
the called C code read and set Perl variables? How does a Perl script running
in nested environments pass a command running in a specific environment? Think
multiple ADDRESS statements in a REXX script with all of TS
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Peter Sylvester [peter.sylves...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 11:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: R
Thanks all for your helpful feedback. Presentation is updated: DHE key
exchange, elliptic curve, ...
In case anyone is interested, I'm going to give it on Wednesday a week from
today. Go here to register. Watch out for the wrap.
http://events.r20.constantcontact.com/calendar/monthview?eso=001V-N0
On 23/06/2021 13:04, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Allow applications to establish environments for scripts (ADDRESS) , allow
call-backs from within scripts and access the variables of the scripts. I wish
that I could do that from within Perl, although I'd take the time to learn
Python or Ruby if they
Hi,
What about extending/embedding.html of the python doc ?
On 23/06/2021 13:04, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Allow applications to establish environments for scripts (ADDRESS) , allow
call-backs from within scripts and access the variables of the scripts. I wish
that I could do that from within Pe
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:25:40 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
> Rocket and IBM don't see any value in integrating
>ported tools with TSO as it's not strategic. The main focus is on
>containers.
Is it zCX containers that run Linux workloads or something else?
MKK
-
Allow applications to establish environments for scripts (ADDRESS) , allow
call-backs from within scripts and access the variables of the scripts. I wish
that I could do that from within Perl, although I'd take the time to learn
Python or Ruby if they supported that.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Met
On 23/06/2021 10:38 am, Seymour J Metz wrote:
None of those are relevant to what REXX does best. Again, it's the plumbing,
not the syntactic sugar.
What exactly does REXX do best? What does it do better than Python?
As to large applications, I believe that there are some pretty big ones in
17 matches
Mail list logo
