FWIW Try using this (attached) - HTH - Chris Poncelet (retired sysprog)
On 01/07/2021 03:05, Joe Monk wrote:
> Yep, my bad.
>
> Didnt see that he was trying with a load module, for which the
> linker/binder is required.
>
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 8:35 PM David Spiegel
> wrote:
>
>>
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:35:22 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>
>*IEBUPDTE has the ALIAS command.
>IEBUPDTE, however, does not work on Load Modules.
>On 2021-06-30 21:21, Joe Monk wrote:
>> It's IEBUPDAT that has the ALIAS function
>>
I understand the name "UNIX" was invented as a spoof of
Hi Joe,
Or, as Shmuel pointed out the PDS Command Processor (cbttape.org File
182) or StarTool.
Regards,
David
On 2021-06-30 22:05, Joe Monk wrote:
Yep, my bad.
Didnt see that he was trying with a load module, for which the
linker/binder is required.
Joe
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 8:35 PM
Yep, my bad.
Didnt see that he was trying with a load module, for which the
linker/binder is required.
Joe
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 8:35 PM David Spiegel
wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> *IEBUPDTE has the ALIAS command.
> IEBUPDTE, however, does not work on Load Modules.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> On
Hi Joe,
*IEBUPDTE has the ALIAS command.
IEBUPDTE, however, does not work on Load Modules.
Regards,
David
On 2021-06-30 21:21, Joe Monk wrote:
It's IEBUPDAT that has the ALIAS function
Joe
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:18 AM esst...@juno.com wrote:
Hello,
.
Many, Many, Years ago I seem to
It's IEBUPDAT that has the ALIAS function
Joe
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:18 AM esst...@juno.com wrote:
> Hello,
> .
> Many, Many, Years ago I seem to recall the utility IEHPROG
> provided ALIAS function for assigning an ALIAS to a LOAD module.
> Does any one remeber the syntax and control
Maybe this was what you were thinking with IEBUPDTE?
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.3.0?topic=statements-alias-statement
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:18 AM esst...@juno.com wrote:
> Hello,
> .
> Many, Many, Years ago I seem to recall the utility IEHPROG
> provided ALIAS function for assigning
Senior moment; a lot of TSO commands became front ends to AMS in later releases
of OS/VS2, but not that one. I used PDS for that sort of thing.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:50:35 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Unless you need other TSO stuff in batch, it would be easier to just use
>IDCAMS directly.
>
What's the syntax for that? I find DEFINE ALIAS only for data sets, not
members.
>On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:24:06 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
True, but he also didn't ask about the binder or the link editor.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Spiegel [dspiegel...@hotmail.com]
Sent:
I don't recall IEHPROGM ever being able to do that. I suggest that you download
PDS86 from CBTTAPE.ORG.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:32:51 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>You do it with the linker/binder. Here is an example:
>
>//LKEDEXEC PGM=HEWL,PARM='LIST,AMODE=31,RMODE=ANY,RENT'
>//SYSLIN DD *
> INCLUDE SYSLIB(mainntry)
> ALIAS alias(mainntry)
> ENTRY mainntry
> NAME mainntry(R)
>/*
Hmm.
Yes, and as I recall it will even parse PARM= correctly.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
PINION, RICHARD W. [rpin...@firsthorizon.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi R'Shmuel AMV"SH,
I am familiar with the PDS Command Processor (CBT File 182) and have
been using it for more than 35 years.
The OP did not ask about Public Domain Software.
Regards,
David
On 2021-06-30 14:52, Seymour J Metz wrote:
If you don't have PDS or StarTool.
--
Shmuel (Seymour
If you don't have PDS or StarTool.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Spiegel [dspiegel...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 12:24 PM
To:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:13:46 +, Pommier, Rex
wrote:
>Richard,
>
>Glad to know it still works even though we don't use SDSF. I can say that it
>worked years ago as well. :-) Back in the timeframe you mentioned the shop I
>was at had a need for a small number of users to have access to
Unless you need other TSO stuff in batch, it would be easier to just use IDCAMS
directly.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
That depends on what it is.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30,
You do it with the linker/binder. Here is an example:
//LKEDEXEC PGM=HEWL,PARM='LIST,AMODE=31,RMODE=ANY,RENT'
//SYSLIN DD *
INCLUDE SYSLIB(mainntry)
ALIAS alias(mainntry)
Richard,
Glad to know it still works even though we don't use SDSF. I can say that it
worked years ago as well. :-) Back in the timeframe you mentioned the shop I
was at had a need for a small number of users to have access to view reports in
the spool (no spool archival/viewing software)
No, I didn't say " Years ago it didn't work". I said " Am I only dreaming, but
couldn't one execute SDSF as the TSO TMP.
This might have been from the 80's or 90's timeframe".
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, June
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:02:52 +, PINION, RICHARD W. wrote:
>Yes I did it on a z/OS 2.4 system today, and it worked.
>
Years ago it didn't work. Today it worked. Have you a problem with that?
Interactively, I prefer to use SDSF under ISPF rather than from the READY prompt
because to display
Yes I did it on a z/OS 2.4 system today, and it worked.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 1:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF TMP
[External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:19:26 +, PINION, RICHARD W. wrote:
>Perhaps my wording is incorrect. But, you can use PGM=SDSF in a logon proc.
>I remembered that's how it was done. I tried it, and it does work.
>
Present tense ("does")? Do you mean you tried it today and it does work?
in SDSF
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:24:06 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>
>IEHPROGM doesn't do this.
>
>In TSO, you can:
>|RENAME test.data(member1) test.data(auxmem) ALIAS
>
Would running IKJEFT?? in batch then meet the OP's need? He seemed
to be aware of the TSO facility, but wanted more.
>On 2021-06-30
Hi,
IEHPROGM doesn't do this.
In TSO, you can:
|RENAME test.data(member1) test.data(auxmem) ALIAS
Regards,
David|
On 2021-06-30 12:16, esst...@juno.com wrote:
Hello,
.
Many, Many, Years ago I seem to recall the utility IEHPROG
provided ALIAS function for assigning an ALIAS to a LOAD module.
Perhaps my wording is incorrect. But, you can use PGM=SDSF in a logon proc.
I remembered that's how it was done. I tried it, and it does work.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 12:18 PM
To:
Hello,
.
Many, Many, Years ago I seem to recall the utility IEHPROG
provided ALIAS function for assigning an ALIAS to a LOAD module.
Does any one remeber the syntax and control statements ?
I know TSO has a Command to Supply An Alias Name to a load module
Does any one remember IEHPROG having this
You could execute SDSF as a TSO command, with no ISPF. You couldn't use SDSF as
a TMP.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
PINION, RICHARD W.
Am I only dreaming, but couldn't one execute SDSF as the TSO TMP.
This might have been from the 80's or 90's timeframe.
Confidentiality notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended
OA60641: GROUP CAPACITY LIMIT IS NOT PROPERLY ENFORCED WHEN THE SYSTEM HAS
ABSMSUCAPPING ACTIVE AND THERE IS NO DEFINED CAPACITY LIMIT
Group Capacity limit not properly enforced at z/OS 2.3 when Group Capping and
Absolute MSU Capping are both active and there is no defined capacity limit.
When
31 matches
Mail list logo
