On 14/4/22 09:14, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:46:50 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
Can the behavior be replicated with /bin/sh?
Worth a try.
Indeed. If the same bug exists in both shells Rocket is likely
to fix it sooner than IBM.
The fact that it's using pipe operators
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:46:50 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>>>
>> Can the behavior be replicated with /bin/sh?
>
>Worth a try.
>
Indeed. If the same bug exists in both shells Rocket is likely
to fix it sooner than IBM.
>The fact that it's using pipe operators implies the shell is in play.
>
I
On 13/4/22 21:24, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:19:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
I suspect a bug with bash. You should post your repeatable test case on
Rockets z/OS Open Source Ported Tools forum. Can you enter bash
--version to get the version. I know Rocket recently
On 2022-04-13 12:36 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
How does that report such as ISRSUPC SRCHFOR which might access
every member of a PDS? If it can be limited to report only accesses by
the JCL reader it might overlook accesses by a file tailoring utility.
You can choose to track all references, or
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:22:31 -0400, Gord Tomlin wrote:
>On 2022-04-12 11:21 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>> Say we have a proclib dataset with 1000 members in it. Does anyone have a
>> method to identify members that are being used so we can archive and delete
>> the ones that aren't?
>eventACTION
We used SAS/MXG (which I'm guessing you don't have). But I did want to mention
that you will probably want to read SMF data from your last IPL. We had a
third party product that came up early during an IPL and we would have missed
it, had we not read data from the timeframe of the IPL.
Mike
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:19:48 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>I suspect a bug with bash. You should post your repeatable test case on
>Rockets z/OS Open Source Ported Tools forum. Can you enter bash
>--version to get the version. I know Rocket recently released a new
>ASCII version of bash using
CCB wants to reconfigure the STP role
Site1: BPC1,BP01,BP02
Site2:BPC2,BP03,BP04
Current STP role :
PTS and CTS are in BPC1
BTS is in BPC2
Arbiter is in BP01
Target STP role:
PTS and CTS are in BPC2
BTS is in BPC1
Arbiter is in BP03
The modification of the STP role is currently
I suspect a bug with bash. You should post your repeatable test case on
Rockets z/OS Open Source Ported Tools forum. Can you enter bash
--version to get the version. I know Rocket recently released a new
ASCII version of bash using their z/OS port of gcc.
On 12/4/22 20:32, Michael Babcock
