There are advantages to Windows and Linux based PC's because they will be able
to use the extra capabilities of the emulators they use to emulate the 3270's.
But you are completely correct that you probably don't want very large PC's
because most operators would likely use them to play call of
A load module consists of some txt records, where the entry points and
external variables are deifined, then a short record followed by a
block of binary instruction in a multiple of 1K. During copy /
compress / restore of a module, the binary machine code is regrouped
into different sized blocks
It is better to describe the raw data rather than your interpretation of them.
Show, e.g., the code, ABEND code, reason code, registers.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.ED
That's because you are not attaching the zip file. You need something like
(empty lines are significant):
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="simple boundary"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
...
arbitrary text
simple boundary
Content-type: APPLICATION/ZIP
CONTENT-D
Content-Type: multipart; BOUNDARY="SIMPLE BOUNDARY" means that MIME parts begin
with "SIMPLE BOUNDARY"
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Carmen Vitullo [cv
Fetch protection is is S0c$-04. Please show your code for accessing the CIB.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Ituriel do Neto [03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ
They say that the memory is the second thing to fail.
OS/VS, including MVS, reflects 004 as S0C$ and 005 as S0C%, although the latter
is rare on OS/VS systems. However, OS/VS also reflects some other codes as
S0C4, e.g., reference to an unallocated page.
By the time you get to z/OS there are a
Is the output of an IEBCOPY COPYMOD equal to the input? The results of loading
them into storage are the same, but the won't have the same hash.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSE
IMHO the fundamental error was making storage protect optional.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Phil Smith III [li...@akphs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26,
Is the program in the PPT? If so, what is its key?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Ituriel do Neto [03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent:
The COPYMOD function of IEBCOPY will in some cases combine multiple blocks of a
load module into fewer longer blocks, and where certain blocks contain the
length of the next block, the length will be changed accordingly. In such cases
comparing the original and the copy will not produce a match
Yes; see RGC 2045 and 2046. Thenormal way is to create a multipart message with
one MIME body and include the zip file as the payload.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Even in the later days of OS/360, it was hard to get IBM to take integrity
exposures seriously. Things got better with MVS.
05F0
0A0C
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E
That message does not have an attachment.
The CONTENT-DISPOSITION field has significance to the reciving application, not
to the sending application.
The normal way to do what you want is to zip the file and send a message
containing MIME MIME-Version, Content-Type Header Field and
Content-Tra
>From an z/architecture point of view a program interrupt code could be
>generated by referencing a 64-bit address which was higher than the installed
>amount of memory. But to get an interrupt code 0005 on a z/OS system today is
>significantly more difficult I think.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
htt
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 at 16:20, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> A Historian told me long ago that Addressing exceptions were so rare
> before DAT that MVS/XA elected to reflect 0005 as S0C4 for
> compatibility with existing code.
This sounds oddly backwards.
I can vouch for the Visara boxes. We have console concentrators and they
have been very stable. We use Rocket’s TE software for the consoles.
Works great.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 3:10 PM Jerry Whitteridge <
jerry.whitteri...@albertsons.com> wrote:
> Talk to the Visara folks - they have solution
Hi
Contact me off line and we can discuss. We do have thin client solutions that
would work for you. Depending on your environment you may want to rethink
switching to the OSA-ICC if security concerns are near the top of your list.
Ken
Kenneth A. Bloom
Avenir Technologies Inc
/d/b/a Visara I
Would Chromebooks fit your need? Inexpensive, not Windows, but not sure if
they auto-reboot for updates (I don't actually own one).
OTOH tn3270 capabilitiy would be limited to whichever one(s) Chrome supports.
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:48:12 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:
>Well, S0C4-11 does not mean the storage is fetch-protected. It means the
>virtual address doesn't exist. ..
>
In SA22-7871-10 z/Architecture IBM Reference Summary
I read:
Program-Interruption Codes
At real-storage locations 142-143 (8E-
Talk to the Visara folks - they have solutions that would work for you
Jerry Whitteridge
jerry.whitteri...@albertsons.com
Sr. Manager Managed Services
Albertsons Companies
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Longfellow
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022
We are looking at retiring the coax connected consoles and terminals at our
site.
The obvious answer is an OSA-ICC with ethernet connected tn3270 devices.
Anybody have a glowing recommendation for the replacement device for the
classic 3270 "green screen" workstation console?
I am trying to a
Correct! Bingo!
THAT explains everything.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 10:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: CIBXUTOK fetch protected
Wel
Well, S0C4-11 does not mean the storage is fetch-protected. It means the
virtual address doesn't exist. Are you sure you're looking at a CIB? STCs
have one for the START command, but I think batch jobs only get one when a
command (MODIFY or STOP) is sent to them later on.
sas
On Wed, Apr 27, 2
Mike,
I don't think so, but to remove all doubts i have associated the PROCNAME in
class STARTED with my userid.
Now both STC and batch job run with the same userid, but when batch, the
CIBXTOKN continues to be fetch protected giving me and abend S0C4-11
Best Regards
Ituriel do Nascimento Ne
There is a FRR parm on the IEAMSCHD
Isn’t the SETFRR done on your behalf when issuing the IEAMSCHD macro ?
> On Apr 27, 2022, at 12:34 PM, Mike Shaw wrote:
>
> Joseph,
>
> I have to comment...many of your initial posts over the months you have
> posted on this list lack enough detail for any
I used to run this with XMITIP - email attachment is in separate file, either
HFS or MVS
//XMIT EXEC XMITIP,COND=((0,NE),(0,EQ))
//*HFS1 DD PATH='/u/eileen/tmp/statfile/edupstat.zip',
//* PATHDISP=(KEEP,KEEP) PATHMODE=SIRXU
//HFS1 DD DSN=X.MACS.ZIP,DISP=SHR
//SYSIN DD *
%XMITIP (ebar...
I'm not sure what this additional parameter does
BOUNDARY="SIMPLE BOUNDARY"
I don't use that parm in my test job
I think maybe the best option is to try XMIT/IP
I actually may have that tool also, I can check
Carmen
On 4/27/2022 11:28 AM, Sasso, Len wrote:
BOUNDARY="SIMPLE BOUNDARY"
--
/I am n
Joseph,
I have to comment...many of your initial posts over the months you have
posted on this list lack enough detail for anyone to help you without
requesting more information.
As others have pointed out many times, it is better to:
1) Only post on this list after you have done thorough desk-
If I specify either:
CONTENT-TYPE: APPLICATION/ZIP; BOUNDARY="SIMPLE BOUNDARY"
CONTENT-DISPOSITION: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME=TEST.ZIP
CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING: BINARY
or
CONTENT-TYPE: APPLICATION/OCTET-STREAM; BOUNDARY="SIMPLE BOUNDARY"
CONTENT-DISPOSITION: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME=TEST.ZIP
CONTENT-TRA
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:48:04 +, Sasso, Len wrote:
>When I tried to open it with 7-Zip I received the following message:
>
> Can not open file "abc.zip" as archive.
>
Is EBCDIC the problem?
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:14:52 -0500, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>I have an example, not attaching a z
One of the two systems is Dallas. FWIW, I got the no ICSF message on the other
system.
Will try later today with cksum. Definitely should be good enough. This is not
crypto or cybercrime, just "are these two programs the same?"
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Is there a RACF setting to allow a particular user to run any APF
program, or a resource authorization to run this APF program?
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 3:28 PM Ituriel do Neto
<03427ec2837d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The loadlib is APF in both cases because i'm using the
As Mark mentioned - get a copy of XMITIP and you'll find an easy to use z/OS
email tool. You can get it at www.cbttape.org/updates.htm and get file314
or from www.lbdsoftware.com. It supports pkzip, zip390, ISPZIP, SLIKZIP, and
includes a copy of infozip if you don't have a zip product.
Lionel B
I found out i have pkzip on our system, I created a test archive file
and emailed it to myself. 310 bytes, when I save the attachment on my PC
it's zero bytes :( and I cannot open it, so, something is corrupting the
file for me, I suspect it's all security related for me :(
Carmen
On 4/27/202
Sorry, when I tried to open it with 7-Zip, on my laptop, I received the
following message:
Can not open file "abc.zip" as archive.
Thank You and Please Be Safe!
Len Sasso
Systems Administrator Senior
CSRA, A General Dynamics Information Technology Company
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer,
On 2022-04-27 03:39 AM, Colin Paice wrote:
try md5
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=descriptions-md5-calculate-check-md5-cryptographic-hashes
md5 was added to z/OS at the same time as sha256 (z/OS 2.4 June 2020),
and has a dependency on ICSF (described in the doc). The OP has alread
using
CONTENT-TYPE: APPLICATION/ZIP
CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING: BINARY
on the IEBGENER job ?
I'm not sure if there's maybe a parm needed on the PKZIP job to be
comparable with PKZIP on window ?
Carmen
On 4/27/2022 10:48 AM, Sasso, Len wrote:
When I tried to open it with 7-Zip I received t
When I tried to open it with 7-Zip I received the following message:
Can not open file "abc.zip" as archive.
Thank You and Please Be Safe!
Len Sasso
Systems Administrator Senior
CSRA, A General Dynamics Information Technology Company
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer, NY 12144
TEAM: Toget
ok, i found an older JCL from a former job
SUBJECT: Z/OS SYST SMTP MAIL TESTING WITH ATTACHMENT
MIME-VERSION: 1.0
CONTENT-TYPE: APPLICATION/ZIP
CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING: BINARY
CONTENT-DESCRIPTION: TEST ZIP ATTACHMENT
CONTENT-DISPOSITION: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME=CPV8281.ZIP -
On 4/27/2022 10
I don't have any zip products but it's the same statment
I think the CONTENT-TYPE needs to be changed.
CONTENT-DISPOSITION: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME=user.JCL.CNTL(BR14) -
let me see if I have an example of attaching a binary file
On 4/27/2022 10:28 AM, Sasso, Len wrote:
Do you have an example usi
Do you have an example using IEBGENER with a Zip file attachment?
Thank You and Please Be Safe!
Len Sasso
Systems Administrator Senior
CSRA, A General Dynamics Information Technology Company
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer, NY 12144
TEAM: Together Everyone Achieves More
Office Hours: M-F 7 AM -
Hi,
The loadlib is APF in both cases because i'm using the same JCL.
For instance, as STC it is started by the command S PROCNAME, while as a batch
job, using the following JCL:
//JOBNAME (),CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=X,REGION=0M
//A1 EXEC PROCNAME
The PROC is the same, expanded from the same
You can use XMITIP, from Lionel Dyck. You can get it from his website at
https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Regards,
Mark Regan, K8MTR General, EN80tg
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1991),
RUENAAA/CNO WASHINGTON DC//OP-009QCP
Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017
z/OS Network Software Consultant (z NetVi
one more better example
//SMTPTEST EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD *
HELO LITJES2T
MAIL FROM:donotre...@site.com
RCPT TO:<@MAIL.NET:u...@asite.com>
DATA
SUBJECT: Z/OS SYST SMTP MAIL TESTING WITH ATTACHMENT
MIME-VERSION:
sure, below is one example
//SMTPTEST EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=my.MAIL.HEADER,DISP=SHR
HELO sitename
MAIL FROM:
RCPT TO:u...@emdomain.com
DATA
SUBJECT:SMTP TESTING ATTACHEMENT
MIME-VERSION: 1.0
CONTENT-TYPE:
I have already created the Zip file with PKZIP (LRECL=80).
An example of using IEBGENER and attaching the Zip file would be appreciated.
Thank You and Please Be Safe!
Len Sasso
Systems Administrator Senior
CSRA, A General Dynamics Information Technology Company
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer, NY 1
I have an example, not attaching a zip file - do you have a product like
PKZIP on the mainframe?
if you need an example of using IEBGENER and attaching a file I can
provide an example
Carmen
On 4/27/2022 10:04 AM, Sasso, Len wrote:
Is it possible to send an email with a Zip file as an attac
Is it possible to send an email with a Zip file as an attachment, from our
mainframe (z/OS 2.3) executing IEBGENER via SMTP?
If so, could you please provide an example?
Thank You and Please Be Safe!
Len Sasso
Systems Administrator Senior
CSRA, A General Dynamics Information Technology Company
Yes that’s because I had a bad ptr for the IARV64 so my first abend was for D02
when I did my retry all I was attempting to do was to go somewhere in my SRB
and set reg 15 with a bad ie non zero return code
However as the documentation points out if your recovery is a FRR and in using
IEAMSCHD
Does your program get loaded out of an APF authorized library when it runs as a
STC? What's in the STEPLIB concatenation for the batch job? One unauthorized
library makes the whole STEPLIB unauthorized.
Robert Crawford
Mainframe Management
United Services Automobile Association
(210) 913-382
To be clear: are you saying that when you did not specify SDWALSLV at all you
get 60D-14, and when you specified it with a value of 1 you did not?
This what I see for 60d
It is just ridiculous that you continually ignore what someone writes, and then
post only what you think matters inst
Hi all,
I'm trying to reach CIBXTOKN field under CIBX control block, and if the program
is executed as a
batch job, this field is fetch protected, but if it runs as an STC, the access
is granted.
What is the difference?
Best Regards
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
z/OS System Programmer
-
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=rm-headerself-defining-section-50
Joe
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:33 AM Jack Zukt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to "decode" a few SMF type 60 (VSAM Volume Data Set Updated),
> but I have reached a dead end. The greatest part of the information on
> these
Hi,
I am trying to "decode" a few SMF type 60 (VSAM Volume Data Set Updated),
but I have reached a dead end. The greatest part of the information on
these records is the "VSAM Volume Record" information and I cannot find
anywhere how to decode it. It does not seem to rely on "offset/length"
data.
try md5
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=descriptions-md5-calculate-check-md5-cryptographic-hashes
To print the hash of an MVS data set:
md5 "//'SYS2.LOADLIB(XYZMOD)"
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 at 23:30, Charles Mills wrote:
> Is there any z/OS utility that will give a hash of a (tradition
56 matches
Mail list logo
