All updates to TKE's associated with IBM z or LinuxONE servers are only updated
by IBM SSRs. They bring the code to the TKE, logon in Service Mode, and apply
the update or perform the install. IBM does not distribute TKE feature code
updates any other way.
If the code in question was
IEHDASDR was part of MVT (early '70s)
DF/DSS came much later (maybe 10 years?)
On 2022-12-09 13:12, Seymour J Metz wrote:
I believe that DASDR and DF/DSS came later.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
I believe that DASDR and DF/DSS came later.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Steve Beaver [st...@stevebeaver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 7:29 AM
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 08:54:03 +, Ian Worthington wrote:
>When I run JCL with
>//PCAPFN DD PATHOPTS=(OCREAT,ORDWR,OTRUNC),
>// PATHMODE=..., PATH=... // FILEDATA='BINARY'
>
>any existing file gets extended. Yet
>...
> - OTRUNC
> - Specifies that the system is to
>> 0090 EZD1285I TTLS Data CONNID: 0014 SEND CIPHER 1503020002020A
>The 1503020002020A is an SSL alert packet with a fatal error: Unexpected
>message
This brief interchange comes from the archives. I need to find the meaning of
a different cipher.
I've gone through "IP Diagnosis" and
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 08:54:03 +, Ian Worthington wrote:
>When I run JCL with
>//PCAPFN DD PATHOPTS=(OCREAT,ORDWR,OTRUNC),
>// PATHMODE=..., PATH=... // FILEDATA='BINARY'
>
>any existing file gets extended. Yet
>
What program did you name on the EXEC PGM= statement?
It's possible
that was the policy when I started at my current gig, I now manage the
policies so I usually cycle from CFMRPOL1 - 2 .etc...
activate the new policy (2), if there' issues I just reactivate policy (1)
Carmen
On 12/9/2022 9:16 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
At $currentjob whenever an XCF policy is
At $currentjob whenever an XCF policy is changed and stored in the couple
dataset their standard practice is to replace the current active policy using
the same name, CFRMPOL as an example, then activate it. IMHO, this is a bad
practice. I always wrote the updated policy with a new name, then
On 12/8/2022 5:48 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Looks like the answer is no to your question.
-
Although, FENCE=(ACTIVE=YES,VOLUMES=nnn) indicates that JES2 will fence to nnn volumes in
most cases more than one nnn volume can be used in certain situations such as when spool
volumes fill or if the
Searched Google for 'IBM TKE USB format'.
A number of docs discuss how/what for/when to format the USB memory stick.
Regards
Parwez Hamid
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Tony Harminc
Sent: 09 December 2022 05:59
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
If you are interested in not splitting, besides the mention of setting a line
limit, look at the emergency subsystem available in jes2 2.4. And of course
looking at potential automation to detect/ prevent issue may have value.
Although a job in a loop can be a challenge to handle.
Thanks for all the responses. I should have explained what z/VM Link
Aggregation is. This is not about sharing an OSA port between multiple LPARs
(that is easy). With a z/VM vswitch you can connect up to 8 OSA ports to a
single vswitch. Turns out there is no direct equivalent in z/OS, you use
When I run JCL with
//PCAPFN DD PATHOPTS=(OCREAT,ORDWR,OTRUNC),
// PATHMODE=..., PATH=... // FILEDATA='BINARY'
any existing file gets extended. Yet
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=definition-status-group
clearly states that:
- OTRUNC
- Specifies that the
13 matches
Mail list logo
