If prodhlq.product.LINKLIB is ENQed (in this case you can presume it is due to
being in the LNKLST on the driving system), you get this error:
ADR497E (001)-CATLG(07), A CATALOG ERROR OCCURRED WHILE DELETING UNCATALOGED
DATA SET prodhlq.product.LINKLIB. RETURN CODE IS 102, REASON
CODE IS FP-007
Hi
I was trying to chain the SSCT in my SVC DUMP in my verbx exit when trying to
access storage for jesssct I got a not found
Is the information for what’s in the dump in the RTCT
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Please consider voting for this idea to have DSFS createparm support
masking:
https://ibm-z-hardware-and-operating-systems.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/ZOS-I-3869
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
Worry more about your character than your reputati
You might consider an alternate deployment strategy
* A target and dlib zone for each IPL volume.
* Secondary res volsers based on IPL volser
* Symbols based on IPL volser
* File system names based on IPL volser
* Data set names on other than target or dlib based on IPL volser
* Indirect catalogi
I just learned about these SAMPLIB members - and found a few of my
associates who also were unaware.
Sharing:
- SYS1.SAMPLIB(BPXMKDIR) - for root file system (version root)
- SYS1.SAMPLIB(BPXISYS1) - for sysplex root
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Github: https://github
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 09:11:18 -0400, Joseph Reichman
wrote:
>I was trying to chain the SSCT in my SVC DUMP in my verbx exit
> when trying to access storage for jesssct I got a not found
> Is the information for what’s in the dump in the RTCT
You could easily answer these questions for yourself
What I was trying to say was can I Use RTCT control block to see what was
dumped
By the way the second time I specifically dumped the CSA in the sdata and I got
a found for jesssct however the bit flags which specify what was dumped in the
SVC dump
Was the same
> On Oct 15, 2023, at 5:04 PM,
