The obvious answer, which, alas, isn't supported, would be the N' attribute.
RFE?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Binyamin Di
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:38:22 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>The obvious answer, which, alas, isn't supported, would be the N' attribute.
>RFE?
>
Idea?
This belongs on ASSEMBLER-LIST.
Does it matter that the values in a symbol can vary between repetitions? E.g.:
TABLE DC 256AL1(*-TABLE)
I don't see an obvious way to use it in macro code. N' already has a meaning,
the number of items in a list.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:38:22 + Seymour J Metz wrote:
:>The obvious answer, which, alas, isn't supported, would be the N' attribute.
RFE?
:>
:>--
:>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
:>http://ma
As currently defined there isn't one, but it's an obvious extension. Of course,
iBM could also use a different letter, and any RFE should indicate that both
options are acceptable.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
___
Assembler issues are on-topic in IBM-MAIN. There are more eyes but less focus.
No, I would not expect an enhanced N' attribute to be sensitive to the value,
only to the repetition count.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖
One of my logstreams is showing a status of LOSS OF DATA. What's the procedure
to fix that condition?
Mark Jacobs
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com
Rename the logstream, and then define a new one.
Dave Jousma
Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
616.653.8429
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
SMF log stream?
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:41 AM Jousma, David <
01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Rename the logstream, and then define a new one.
>
> Dave Jousma
>
> Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
>
>
> Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD
Yes, one of them. It's in our systems programmer sandbox so I'm not too
concerned, just looking for a procedure that we can follow if it occurs in
other sysplexes.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&sea
You can still fall back to DASD SMF logs in the event something goes wrong
with log streams.
Also ensure AUTODELETE(YES) and RETPD are reviewed for removing old data.
Ensure automation is archiving correctly.
Larger Log streams?
There is a 2010 Share presentation on log streams for SMF. Google
10 matches
Mail list logo