Search order goes from the top (JOBLIB / STEPLIB) and indeed it finds the
module from the first library in the concatenation, if it doesn't find, it
searches next library, if it doesn't find, it looks out in your LNKLST,
LPALST etc and if it finds nowhere, S806 abend will be thrown
Regards,
Ravi
Hello All, I'm getting OC4 abend with SMFDUMP program that handles our SMF
processing, what surprises me is the same program runs good on our Sandbox
& Dev system (with AMODE=24 and RMODE=24)
I presumed the issue could be & recompiled SMFDUMP wiith AMODE=31 as IBM
mentioned this is the issue with
Thanks much 😊😊
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, 1:07 AM Dana Mitchell wrote:
> EMC DLMs support both SNMP and email alert notifications.
>
> Dana
>
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 10:38:20 +0530, RCG wrote:
>
> >Hi Experts, Can you please shed some light on setting up H/W alerts on
ocess SNMP and process as appropriate? This is
> pretty standard and not mainframe specific, but there are good mainframe
> based SNMP handlers such as from Broadcom (Vantage product).
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:08 PM RCG wrote:
>
> > Hi Experts, Can you please shed som
Hi Experts, Can you please shed some light on setting up H/W alerts on
Mainframes, We had a situation where one of the two DLM switch failed 2
weeks ago and before we plan a change to replace that, second one failed as
well resulting in DLM outage :(
Regards,
-
essage IAT8581
>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.iatb300/inqn.htm
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 4:52 AM RCG wrote:
>
> > Hello Experts, Quick question if anyone here has expertise on JES3 DJC
> > (Dependent Job Control), All I need to
Hello Experts, Quick question if anyone here has expertise on JES3 DJC
(Dependent Job Control), All I need to know is, How to find the list of
JOBS running in a given LPAR which uses DJC network please? Any pointers to
look at would be much appreciated
Regards,
RCG
doing what Dave said with BPX Parms and issuing the Set
> command should bring in NFS.
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of RCG
> > Sent: Thursday
And other catch is Lizette, The STC ID for this task has no OMVS segment, I
had requested the Security folks to get one for me
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, RCG wrote:
> Hi Lizette, Interesting -
>
> Here is O/P of /D OMVS,PFS -
>
> -D OMVS,PFS
> BPXO068I 11.35.21 DISPLA
AUTOMNT TIME=2015/09/13 06:42:11 SYSTEM= USER=OMVSKERN
POLICY=/etc/auto.master
So can't see NFS here..
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:34 AM, RCG wrote:
> Hi David, I think my issue quite close to " The z/OS NFS client is started
> when the z/OS UNIX file system is
bm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.nfs/nfs.htm
>
> NFS configuration Section
>
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.idan400/nfsconf.htm
>
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of RCG
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 11:11 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: NFS Client implementation query
>
> Thanks Lizette -
>
> Here i
e-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of RCG
> > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 7:43 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: NFS Client implementation query
> >
> > Thanks for the respo
Thanks for the responses Scott & Allan.
NFSv4 Client is to mount non mainframe server path under USS, I believe
that's the solution available (Not sure if anything else, Please do direct
me if any)
Allan, Not certain if that is spawning a server, Am quite new to this and
trying to understand bett
Dear Listers,
Need expert advise here on the NFS Client implementation on zOS platform
- I've configured the parms in BPXPRMxx.
- Had set-up the STC proc in the active proclib
- Had made necessary Security definitions (STC ID, definition to STARTED
CLASS, dataset access)
However, When I start th
Dear group,
Not sure if this was already discussed / notified... So for the benefit of
everyone..
The FACILITY class profile BPX.DEFAULT.USER is not supported in z/OS 2.1.
> BPX.DEFAULT.USER provides users without OMVS segment a 'temporary' OMVS
> segment when USS services are invoked.
>
> So, be
Thats absolutely right..
On Oct 17, 2013 1:44 PM, "Robert Hahne" wrote:
> > If India was very poor in terms of economy, There are many others poorer
> > than we think, why dont IBM think of it then? B-)
>
>
> IBM is not doing business to raise the economy of poor countries .
> But they should als
If India was very poor in terms of economy, There are many others poorer
than we think, why dont IBM think of it then? B-)
On Oct 17, 2013 11:11 AM, "Ron Hawkins" wrote:
> Ed,
>
> That's great news. Good for the economy of a very poor country.
>
> Ron
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From:
Dear Group,
I believe most of you perhaps received this news flash on TWS for z/OS, If
no, Please take a look below and to ensure the respective actions are taken
prior to December 10th 2013,
If yes, am little unsure what to check and confirm that my environment is
not affected by this although w
Dear group, Any further details down with this? Was this discussed and / or
considered to get the hipers applied other than common servicea14.1 ? Not
sure as I did not get notification as such from CA probably because my shop
uses r 14 presumably not applicable to it ? Pls direct me to the link if
ic Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 626-302-7535 Office
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
>
>
>
> From: Elardus Engelbrecht
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
> Date: 09/03/2013 08:34 AM
> Subject: Re: JES2 start fai
was the last successful IPL and any changes done.
> You dont even share your DASD with other System ?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <
> shmuel+...@patriot.net> wrote:
>
> > In
> > ,
> > on 09/03/2013
> >at 02:38 PM, R
Hi Jake.. Good question.. Unfortunately this lpar has no SADMP set-up.. Its
a sandbox and a stand-alone system :-(
On Sep 3, 2013 7:31 PM, "Jake anderson" wrote:
> What does your SADMP says ?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:21 PM, RCG wrote:
>
> > Hi John, Yeah r
2 proc has a decent REGION=. I'd go with REGION=0M myself.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:38 AM, RCG wrote:
>
> > Dear Group,
> >
> > I am looking at a strange issue this morning while I had to IPL my test
> > system.. While I try to start JES2 its failing w
Dear Group,
I am looking at a strange issue this morning while I had to IPL my test
system.. While I try to start JES2 its failing with S878 rc 10.. knowing
its an Private storage shortage, wondering what happened with no changes
made to the system at all.. We are on zOS 1.12 at the moment.. Any
e
There are many ways to determine the contention with a dataset.. As you
have already got an examples with above replies.. The best way to determine
is with D GRS,C or D GRS,RES=(*,dsname in question) or if u r in ispf panel
3.4 option press F1 twice having the dsn in question listed
On Aug 28, 2013
> OA39768 or OA22587. Also, it's helpful if you provide z/os level and
> whether or not you are in a shared filesystem sysplex.
> To your question about a missing mount, IMHO I wouldn't think that would
> cause this kind of issue.
>
> MA
>
>
>
> On Thu, 15
ussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of RCG
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:47 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: OMVS terminated abruptly caused an outage
>
> Dear Group,
>
> One of our system sufferred an outage due to OMVS terminated abrupt
Dear Group,
One of our system sufferred an outage due to OMVS terminated abruptly with
message id BPXI019E OMVS DETECTED A SEVERE INTERNAL ERROR THAT WILL REQUIRE
A RE-IPL TO CORRECT..
There was a dump taken and had to quiesce the workload and re-IPL the
system immediately..
We have had sent the
Thanks a lot for everyone and appreciate your time and help, I
will consider the recommendations given as i move on, Thanks again!
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:00 AM, nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
> > Not sure how Workload Manager is being used or configured at your shop.
>
> From the original descriptio
> Senior Software Engineer, Software Services
> Syncsort Incorporated
> 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
> P: 201-930-8260 | M: 512-627-3803
> E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@L
31 matches
Mail list logo
