Not sure exactly what you are asking for here.
ISMF option 2 will give you loads of information about the DASD online to each
LPAR, including unit address and what type of device (3390 model 3, 9 etc)
FDRREPORT can also give you this sort of info
DCOLLECT might be useful.
I'm sure there are mo
Ron,
If they are in the output queue, then they probably haven't been printed.
Do you want to keep a copy on the output queue?
If not, just change the class and destination to one that a printer processes.
If you want the output copy left, you could do something like XDC it to a flat
file,
Ron,
Forgive me, but it sounds like you are a little out of your depth with this.
Z13 doesn't allow a CTC? Since when? AFAIK, you can have a FICON CTC on ANY
z hardware.
"TCPNJE has been working for nearly 3 years and then all of a sudden it isn't
and networking says it's a mainframe prob
Ron,
AFAIK, you are correct regarding a virtual CTC, but you can still define a real
FICON CTC - I think I'm correct in saying you just need one spare FICON port,
unlike ESCON, where you needed two, and a cable between them.
Assuming nothing has changed on the mainframe, and you are running JES2
Dana,
From what I remember, no switch is required. I believe any FICON port will do.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Ron,
You don't need a separate FICON port for a FICON CTC (FCTC). Any FICON port
that is shared between the LPARS can be used. FCTC would just be another LCU
on that port.
However, all the examples and diagrams about FCTC in the FICON manuals describe
using a switch - that's simply not requir
Ron,
Your PORT statement should be fine. It's recommended in the z/VM manual.
The NETSTAT ALLCONN display shows that JES's NETSRV is listening (waiting for a
connection from another TCP/IP) on port 175.
It also shows two established connections -
one JES NETSRV connection between 10.100.5.71
Silly question, but does your TARGET.IBM390PS APPLDATA have the SNMP community
name of the SE in upper case?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the messa
of course I meant $USERDATA - sorry. Too much RACF, not enough ACF2...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Ron,
You have an established session from JES's Netserv to z/VM -
EZZ2587I JES2S001 7D6F 10.100.5.71..175 10.100.5.73..3603
Establsh
(What's at port 3603 on z/VM btw?)
Your start link looks successful, both on z/VM & z/OS - that seems to suggest
that the network is ok.
The QUE
Ron,
If JES is saying the networking is started, that suggests that the connection
between JES and z/VM is good.
Your PROFILE TCPIP might tell you what's on port 3603, but the z/VM TCPIP
command NETSTAT ALLC should display the connection.
If the nje connection is starting, then you should be ab
Ron,
I'm afraid this has now gone outside my area of expertise...
From what IBM say it's z/VM that's caused the connection to close, which
suggests that the output on the z/OS side is ok.
Sorry I can't be of any more help. It would be useful to know what the outcome
is though.
---
Ron,
glad you got it working.
I did ask you to do a query link a few posts ago, but I think you maybe missed
it? Never mind, all's well that ends well..
Vince.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
ok, stupid question time.
I've not done this before. I'm attempting to follow the instructions in the
flash document, but fall at the first hurdle...
How, exactly, do I "download" the certificate to my workstation?
I tried to copy the text at the link and pasted to a .txt document, but when
Excellent. Thanks for that. It worked for me.
They obviously didn't want to make it easy!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAI
I spoke too soon!
I've followed the steps on the flash, and my RACF database shows: -
Label:DigiCert Global Root CA
Certificate ID:2QiJmZmDhZmjgcSJh4nDhZmjQMeTloKBk0DZlpajQMPB
Status:TRUST
Start Date:2006/11/10 00:30:00
I have that in a different keyring - always have had, and it's always worked
before.
In my SMP/e ORDERSRVR data: -
keyring="userid/SMPEKeyring"
certificate="SMPE Client Certificate"
in my FTP data options: -
KEYRING IBMUSER/FtpSecur
(don't blame me, this is the way it was se
Thanks.
That's it. I hadn't realised the global cert had to be attached to the
SMPEKeyring.
Sorry!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Good morning all.
The company I'm currently working for have a GDPS, and are using FICON
directors inbetween the CEC's.
These directors are out of support, and the company wants to get rid of them.
They currently use FICON CTC's between the LPARs in the PLEX.
My question is, can we go to point
Thanks.
I'd like to turn that AFAIK to a definite yes!
I'm now told all XCF traffic is on CF's.
Thanks for the other info. They already use EE, and I've suggested that for
cross-domain traffic, but they want to stay away from the corporate network, so
I think PTP CTC may be my only option, if
Thanks.
It's Not my decision...
I'll definitely be testing. We have two directors, and I'll be removing one at
a time...
I'd still like someone to confirm what I want to do is even possible...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signo
Venkat,
I'm not sure Gil's REXX is going to help you.
Can you confirm a few things for me?
You don't have any tape management system, and you have @1000 tapes?
If there is no software to manage them, how do you do it? How do you know
what's on each tape, when it can be overwritten etc etc?
Gadi,
It's been years since I've done anything like this, and things have probably
changed, but yes, AFAIK it can only be done from single object operations.
I think the FTP IP address is the server / pc where the IOCP source resides.
I seem to remember the server / pc had to be on the same ne
Phillip,
What you are trying to do is NOT an IDCAMS process.
This is a FDR ABR process. You are adding volumes to the ABR archive pool.
(Think DFHSM ML1 if you know / understand DFHSM)
Unfortunately, the site I'm currently at doesn't use FDR ABR, so I don't have
access to the FDR manuals, but
Phillip,
I'm guessing this is related to your previous post about adding volumes to a
FDR ABR archive pool?
I believe the dataset you refer to is a "special" FDR dataset.
From what I remember (and it's been a while), to add a volume, you use ICKDSF
to initialise the volume, then the FDR panels
Kees,
An IPL is hardly a random event (I hope!)
What's defined to your LPAR on the HMC? - that's what will come online at IPL
time.
Do you have PRESCPU coded in your IEASYSxx member for that LPAR?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
And then, of course, there is zOSMF to contend with...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Silly question, but are the Custompac dialog datasets available to your z/OS
2.2 system?
I had to import the catalog that contained the HLQ for my CPAC datasets into
the new 2.2 master cat when I did my install.
--
For IBM-MAIN
Hi,
I've been asked to change the IDICNF member for Fault Analyzer to include a
specific set of STC's that had previously been excluded.
No problem there, but is it possible to get Fault Analyzer to pick up the new /
changed member without stopping / restarting it?
I've looked through the Fault
Hi,
I think this is resolved. A Colleague found this in the Fault Analyzer for z/OS
User's Guide and Reference: -
If the IDIS subsystem is started and the PARM='FASTEXCLUDE' option is in effect
(this is the default), then all Include and Exclude options specifications from
the IDICNF00 parmlib
Hi,
Due to budget constraints, my contract is being cut short (but that's another
story).
I've been asked to allow others access to the HMC, so that they can IPL
systems, and have set up a bunch of new userids on the HMC. As far as I can
tell they have all the authority that my HMC userid has
All,
Thanks for your help. I hadn't realised that more, in this instance, was not
better.
I deleted one of the new HMC users and redefined it the same as mine. They
could then get the "normal" window when they chose Load.
I've now deleted and re-defined all the new users the same as mine.
--
I thought Timefinder was for replicating data at a local level? (like Flashcopy
/ snapshot)
You seem to be suggesting moving the data to a remote EMC box. I would have
thought SRDF would be the product to use?
--
For IBM-MAIN
Nathan,
try something like this: -
RESTORE TYPE=DSF,ICFCAT=ALIAS
SELECT DSN=old dataset name,
NEWN=new dataset name
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
Can someone please point me to the announcement? I can't find it. Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Excellent. Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Lizette is correct -
The DLm is essentially just a device that represents tape drives to the
mainframe. It needs backend storage, such as a DataDomain or Vmax to actually
store the tape data.
When a tape is requested, the mainframe asks the DLm, which "passes through"
the request to the backe
Peter,
I'm a little confused here - can you clarify please?
Going the other way, I believe you currently have a z196, which has an ESCON
connection to a 9034 ESCON converter. This has a BUS & TAG connection to a FEP
of some description, which has a Token Ring link to something - is that
corre
Nothing yet, and it's 09:42 on the 24th May here!
Come on IBM, Why haven't you published the link you promised us you would
publish yesterday
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to l
"Now to wait for a link to get a UID/token..."
09:37 on the 25th May here in the UK and still nothing
I've emailed 'cont...@ecurep.ibm.com' and asked where the link is.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access in
IBM ECUREP tell me that: -
"A PCM ticket V180523110803S with high priority is already in progress since
the instructions for creating the IBM Support File Transfer ID were not
provided. "
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a
Update
So I asked EcuRep when we might be able to register for an id. There response
was:-
"There is no date yet established but given the fact that the current FTP
process for ECuRep and Testcase will remain available June 21, 2018, I'm sure
that the instructions will be provided way ahead o
I'm not a Netview or Systems Automation expert, but I THINK what's happening
here is that SVTM052I is a multi-line message, and you are trying to process it
like a single line message.
Note in your post that there are THREE lines that have the message number
SVTM052I.
I'm guessing that Netview
The client I'm working at runs z/OS 2.1. z/OS 2.1 goes out of service this
year, but IBM seem to have jumped the gin by getting rid of the knowledgecentre
for it!
Now when I click on my saved link (which worked earlier this morming [UK
time]), I get: -
Documentation for z/OS V2.1.0 is no long
Saurabh,
How much is your management willing to spend on achieving this requirement?
From the few posts that I've seen, I'd suggest no-one here does this now, or
has ever done it. If a company wants to monitor it's mainframe resource usage
dynamically, it buys and impliments a product. (BMC Mai
Peter,
What is your question exactly?
If you MEAN a "hot standby" - which I understand to mean a system that is IPL'd
but not being used, but could take on workload from a currently active and used
system, I'd say that's not a SYSPLEX, that's a disaster recovery scenario.
If you are trying to c
I'm pretty sure I hit the same problem.
Silly question, but you do have the coexistence SPE on your system?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the messag
Hi all,
I've discovered some very odd behaviour when running a DFHSM command in the
same batch job as a DFSORT step, and I'm completely baffled by what's happening.
We're running z/OS 2.2, although it also happens on 1.3 and 1.10.
I've written a piece of JCL that issues some DFHSM commands, runs
Sorry about the tags. I thought I had that right
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thanks all for your responses.
Allan,
I DELETED ‘MAINT.TEMP.LIST’ before running the second job – can’t get more
freed than that…
I tried pre-allocating it – Still get the ARC0141I message.
Kolusu,
I’m sorry, you are wrong. OUTDATASET is created by DFHSM at the time of
issuing the LIST comman
Gonzalo,
Yep. I know I can do that. I’m trying to avoid it if possible.
Peter,
Didn’t see your reply originally, no idea why. Yes I really want to do some
SORTing. What I coded was just for demonstration purposes.
I think you may have missed that in my “real” job, I run a REXX on
MAINT.TEMP.
David,
Perfect. Thanks. That explains everything.
In fact to confirm this, I replaced the DFSORT step with an IEFBR14 step, just
allocating MAINT.TEMP.LIST DISP=SHR - I get the ARC0141I message, and the job
fails JCL error.
So either I have to do the SORT in my REXX, or I have to run two jobs
Lizette,
We don't have automation or scheduling software, but thanks.
Putting the sort into the REXX worked like a champion.
I hadn't thought about doing everything in REXX, but I see no reason that
wouldn't work.
Thanks to everyone that responded.
---
Hi all,
I'm supporting a development system, and we run multiple versions of z/OS
(amongst other things).
One of the systems we run is at z/OS 2.2, and runs JES3. This system is
supposed to be our "performance Test" system.
One of our developers this morning was complaining about slow response
Thanks Lucas.
You may be on to something. If I do a LOG S and then max to the top, the
earliest entry is for 21st December 2015
My z/OS 2.2 JES2 system only goes back to 20th March 2016.
How do I get rid of old / selected SYSLOGs?
(I'm a JES2 person - I know next to nothing about JES3!)
Hi all.
We ran out of scratch tapes on one of the systems I look after. After
investigation, it appears that DFRMM (or DFHSM) doesn't seem to be releasing
old CDS backup tapes back to the scratch pool.
I have the following coded in ARCCMDxx for DFHSM CDS backups: -
SETSYS CDSVERSIONBACKUP(BACK
Thanks guys,
Sorry for the lack of response on my part.
We moved offices and datacentres at the weekend, and our DS600o that holds all
our z/OS & z/VM systems didn't power-up...
I've been busier than a one legged man in an Ar** kicking contest...
Can you say "thank god for tape backups"?
Once
So, having restored all the systems we had backed up, I can now re-visit this.
Is dfHSM defined as an EDM (External Data Manager) to dfRMM?
If not, there is a section in the dfHSM Installation and Customization Guide on
how to do this.
Allan,
I can't find a dfHSM Installation and Customizat
So, having found that these tapes are a VITAL RECORD,
I found the following VRS: -
HSM.%CDS.BACKUP.V¬¬¬ and HSM.JRNL.BACKUP.V¬¬¬
HSM.%CDS.BACKUP.V¬¬¬ has the following: -
Data set mask . : 'HSM.%CDS.BACKUP.V¬¬¬' GDG . : NO
Job name mask . :
All,
Thanks for the hep so far. Please bear in mind that I "inherited" this site
from another contractor, and have no documentation about what was done or why.
He set this up.
I also have no prior experience with RMM.
Try changing the "count" in the VRS to a "more reasonable (FSVO reasonab
Allan,
Try changing the "count" in the VRS to a "more reasonable (FSVO reasonable)
value.
e.g. 10 and see if the tapes release.
I've done that, and verified the VRS's, and re run RMM "housekeeping". Now
some tapes have a status of PENDING RELEASE.
The only ACTION PENDING I can see is RETU
Thanks all,
Greg,
We have TVEXTPURGE(RELEASE) coded.
Allan,
I've re-run RMM housekeeping a few times. It would seem that RMM isn't
releasing ANY scratch tapes now...
Lizette,
Unfortunately I'm restricted to how many PMR's I can open in a year (4 - the
company I work for are a software develo
Hi all,
It looks like I had to wait until after mid-night...
My normal RMM housekeeping run (which runs @01:30am) released (wait for it)
89 tapes back to the scratch pool!
I think CA1 is similar in it's scratch processing. Thanks for all your help!
Hi all,
I've hit an issue with our one-pack rescue system that has me really puzzled.
I should say in advance that we've re-built and re-ipl'd this system many times
this year, all without issue, and apologise for any layout issues.
I re-built the one-pack today. We use the same JCL to build
Thanks for your help everyone.
It was indeed the parenthesis. Once I replied using quotes instead of
brackets, JES2 started fine.
Lizette, no need for a HASPPARM DD statement in the JES2 PROC. There's a SHARE
presentation around that has a JES2 procedure even more minimalistic than mine!
---
Don't know if this will help anybody else out, but I had problems receiving a
PTF today using SMP/e orderserver, client and FTP data that had worked since I
started here.
Looking at the output, it seemed that the IBM site was no longer using my FTP
data dataset. It was looking for /etc/ftp.dat
Richard,
I'm a little confused as to exactly what you are trying to do here.
You seem to be confusing FICON with Fibre Channel - they're different.
If you want to connect the 3592 to a zSeries mainframe via FICON, then you have
to define it (and then it's tape drives)to the mainframe (and operat
And then I found this: -
3592 introduction and planning guide: -
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S7001860&aid=1
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listser
Hi all,
Bit of a long shot here, but does anyone have any manuals for what used to be
Stirling Softwares, and is now CAs Solve:Scheduler?
The client I'm working at has the product (V6.2, I think), but no manuals, no
documentation, and no-one left who knows the product in any detail...
I tried C
Hi all,
Is anyone out there running IMS V9 on z/OS 1.13?
I know IMS v9 has been out of support since 2010, but that's where we are. I
can see from the IBM site that V10, 11 & 12 of IMS will run on z/os 1.13, but
not v9.
I can't see why it wouldn't run, but would like some confirmation (or
ot
Thanks to all those that replied. Good to know we aren't the only ones!
We lost our IMS guy (retired), and are unlikely to replace him. I've never
done an IMS upgrade, so rather than rush into it, I'm probably going to upgrade
z/OS 1st, and approach IMS with caution!
Thanks again.
-
Hi All,
I have a bunch of OEM TARGET and DLIB zones on my system, but don't appear to
have a GLOBAL zone that they 'belong' to.
Is there a way of interrogating the TARGET / DLIB zone to see which GLOBAL zone
it is (supposed to be) a 'child' of?
Bit of background, I took over running this system
Hi all,
I'm looking for the following manual: -
IBM TS7700 (or TS7720 or TS77740) Virtualisation Engine AIX and Microcode
Install
All the hyperlinks I find get me to a "Page not found" or "Topic not found"
error screen, and for reasons I'd rather not get into, I can't raise a pmr.
The document
Juergen,
There are two possible usermods for LE. If you have CEEDOPT or CEECOPT, these
are installation wide options. The CEEPRMxx parmlib member will only affect
that LPAR, and you can also have a CEEROPT usermod for a particular region.
So to answer your question, you can use both. CEEPRMxx
Just as per the title really,
Since the demise of Yahoo groups, Is there still a system automation list /
group?
I'm trying to find any information on a set of SA supplied REXX (member names
INGFIFxx) that apparently interface with the SA PDB to query information held
in SA ISPF tables. I'm t
Excellent, Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
76 matches
Mail list logo