"restful" just seems like such a misnomer to me. I don't find that API to
be very restful at all. Yes, I know that REST is one of those weird
acronyms.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Gil,
See:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zosmf/vxrx/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zosmf.configguide.help.doc%2FIZUHPINFO_API_RESTJOBS.html
These are "restful" web services APIs, for interfacing with JES2 or JES3.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:32:04 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>My shorthand is this long(er)hand in the announcement:
>
>"In z/OS V2.1 with z/OSMF V2.1, the z/OS Jobs REST Interface is planned to
>be extended to add support for submitting jobs from data sets and z/OS UNIX
>files"
>
What's new th
My shorthand is this long(er)hand in the announcement:
"In z/OS V2.1 with z/OSMF V2.1, the z/OS Jobs REST Interface is planned to
be extended to add support for submitting jobs from data sets and z/OS UNIX
files"
I couldn't even parse that. What does "submit jobs to z/OS UNIX" even mean?
I guess, to me, the use of the word "job" indicates a batch job with JCL.
Which has nothing to do with UNIX. Now, if they had said "start a UNIX
process to run a command or script, or sequence of them" (like Co:Z Batch
does
Tim,
How is z/OSMF being enhanced to submit jobs to z/OS Unix???
(or what does the preview say that leads you to believe this? )
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
+1 636.300.0901
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
> I'm reliably informed there's more U
I'm reliably informed there's more UNIX-related content planned for z/OS
2.1 than is listed in the preview announcement. The preview announcement is
evidently what IBM feels comfortable describing at this stage, but I
wouldn't be surprised if there's a bit more. (I'm speaking only for myself,
as al
On 12/02/2013 12:07 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:44:34 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
On 11/02/2013 1:04 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
To steer back to the topic at hand, there's a long list of UNIX-related
enhancements listed in the z/OS 2.1 Preview. Many/most of them match wha
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:44:34 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>On 11/02/2013 1:04 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>>
>> To steer back to the topic at hand, there's a long list of UNIX-related
>> enhancements listed in the z/OS 2.1 Preview. Many/most of them match what
>> I'd like to see personally.
>
I d
