Re: A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP

2017-02-14 Thread Salva Carrasco
When we started 5.1 migration, we obtained the Local-variables CEEDUMP for batch but not for CICS. I remember opened a PMR and the issue was the lack of SYS1.CCSLIB in RPL concatenation. Check it in LNKLST & RPL. Regards, salva. -

AW: Re: A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP

2017-02-08 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> URL to the APAR please? Google cannot find it. Sorry, could not find it myself from home right before posting. Was looking it up from the PMR. Will check from the office tomorrow and post. -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP

2017-02-08 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
URL to the APAR please? Google cannot find it. Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 1:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: AW: A further question regarding

AW: A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP

2017-02-08 Thread Peter Hunkeler
>Anyway, TEST is much improved with COBOL V5/V6, we put the Debug data in a NOLOAD class segment in the Program Object, so that it is always available, always in sync with the load, and never takes up memory at runtime unless it is needed. An example of when it is needed is when a CEEDUMP is being

A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP

2017-02-07 Thread Tom Ross
>A further question: the CEEDUMP we receive in COBOL 5 lacks a dump of the >WORKING STORAGE SECTION. Can this be remedied by changing compile-time or >run-time parameters? I know this is old, not sure if it got answered or not... To get WORKING-STORAGE (and LOCAL-STORAGE) date items listed in C

Re: A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP

2017-01-26 Thread Lizette Koehler
age- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 8:58 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP > > It would help to know what yo

Re: A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP

2017-01-26 Thread Lizette Koehler
t; To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP > > A further question: the CEEDUMP we receive in COBOL 5 lacks a dump of the > WORKING STORAGE SECTION. Can this be remedied by changing compile-time or > run-time parameters? > > Please advis

A further question regarding COBOL5 and CEEDUMP

2017-01-26 Thread Steff Gladstone
A further question: the CEEDUMP we receive in COBOL 5 lacks a dump of the WORKING STORAGE SECTION. Can this be remedied by changing compile-time or run-time parameters? Please advise. Thank you, Steff Gladstone On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Steff Gladstone wrote: > Are there any whizzes ou