AW: Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-19 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Peter, I don't care. I tried to help Robin, the OP. Maybe you can help to solve his problem? -- Peter Hunkeler Von: Peter Relson An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Betreff: Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance Datum: 18.09.18, 13:44 - Is the INIT routine run under the region

Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-19 Thread Robin Atwood
m: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: 19 September 2018 18:41 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance >In the exit I issue a RACROUTE VERIFY for a user's id and >stash the resulting ACEE in ASXBSENV. I

Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-19 Thread Peter Relson
>In the exit I issue a RACROUTE VERIFY for a user's id and >stash the resulting ACEE in ASXBSENV. I don't think of the ASCRE INITRTN as an exit in the normal usage of the term. It runs too early to do much of anything. For example, dynamic allocation is not available until after the INITRTN

Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-18 Thread Robin Atwood
and ACEE inheritance - Is the INIT routine run under the region control task, or under the started task control task (I suspect the latter)? Why do you care under which task the routine runs? You should probably not be doing anything that cares. FWIW, it does not run under the RCT task

Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-18 Thread Peter Relson
- Is the INIT routine run under the region control task, or under the started task control task (I suspect the latter)? Why do you care under which task the routine runs? You should probably not be doing anything that cares. FWIW, it does not run under the RCT task. And it does not run under

Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-17 Thread Robin Atwood
The hook produced an 0C4 but that served the purpose. The TCB chain is IEEVAR00->IEAVTSDT->IEEPRWI2. The last module is, unsurprisingly, involved in STC initialisation and links to the exit. Robin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-17 Thread Robin Atwood
problem! Thanks Robin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler Sent: 17 September 2018 15:56 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance >Apologies for the delay in replying but y

Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-17 Thread Peter Hunkeler
>Apologies for the delay in replying but your response got flagged as spam >somewhere and I did not see it. I finally found it in the archives! My bad. The flag had been set by GMX, and I badly missed to remove it from the subject when replying. I recognized after sending, and for a quick

Re: ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-17 Thread Robin Atwood
Peter- Apologies for the delay in replying but your response got flagged as spam somewhere and I did not see it. I finally found it in the archives! I am not sure where the original ACEE of the child STC is coming from since both it and the parent STC have similar JCL procedure names that match

AW: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler
>The obvious solution would be to set the ACEE in the address-space >initialisation exit and that is what I did and it seemed to work. The new STC >is still owned by the mother task's ACEE but data set accesses are governed by >the new ACEE. Since ASCRE starts a new started task similar to

ASCRE and ACEE inheritance

2018-09-06 Thread Robin Atwood
Has anyone had any luck starting a new address-space with ASCRE but specifying a non-default ACEE? I tried our usual technique of inserting the desired ACEE address into TCBSENV and ASXBSENV but it was ignored. The obvious solution would be to set the ACEE in the address-space initialisation