Hello All,
I have been under the impression for decades that SYNAD exits are called in
24-bit mode.
Recently I have been having problems in one of my programs.
The problem goes as follows:
I am reading an input file that is defined as:
//INPUTDD *,SYMBOLS=JCLONLY
OUTPUT DATASET &OUTDSN *othe
: Monday, November 6, 2023 11:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Addressing mode for SYNAD exit
Hello All,
I have been under the impression for decades that SYNAD exits are called in
24-bit mode.
Recently I have been having problems in one of my programs.
The problem goes as follows:
I am
My notes from 2005 seem to imply that the SYNAD exit may be called in 31-bit
mode. I think it is called in the mode under which the GET or PUT was issued.
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
To answer Seymour J. Metz's question first, it's specified in the DCB.
To answer Charles Mills' question, the module is defined as RMODE 24, AMODE
ANY, so the I/O was issued in 31-bit mode.
Which now rings a bell, I, too, vaguely remember that SYNAD is called in
the A-Mode of the code issuing th
> does this mean IBM has an issue in that they aren't clearing the flags
>from the DCB address when they load it for passing to the SYNAD exit, or is
>it my responsibility to clear the high byte
Not sure, but I can darn sure tell you what the fastest resolution would be!
Charles
On Mon, 6 Nov 2
Yep!
I've already done that, added an NILH to strip away the high byte, but it
does make for an interesting question.
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 12:30 PM Charles Mills wrote:
> > does this mean IBM has an issue in that they aren't clearing the flags
> >from the DCB address when they load it for pa
1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Addressing mode for SYNAD exit
Yep!
I've already done that, added an NILH to strip away the high byte, but it
does make for an interesting question.
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 12:30 PM Charles Mills wrote:
> > does this mean IBM has
du/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Charles Hardee
Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 12:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Addressing mode for SYNAD exit
To answer Seymour J. Metz's question fi