Re: Amode 64 JSON library?

-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Amode 64 JSON library? My advice is to abandon the horrible Web Enablement services and build a good C JSON parser like json-c. Even better if you can ditch C and use C++ because then you have some very nice options. https://github.com/json-c/json-c https

Re: Amode 64 JSON library?

Discussion List On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 10:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Amode 64 JSON library? My advice is to abandon the horrible Web Enablement services and build a good C JSON parser like json-c. Even better if you can ditch C and use C

Re: Amode 64 JSON library?

wrote: Yes, we are linking in HWTJCSS. It only contains 18 entry points for the 31 bit routines, AFAICT. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Colin Paice Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 4:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Amode 64 JSON library

Re: Amode 64 JSON library?

Yes, we are linking in HWTJCSS. It only contains 18 entry points for the 31 bit routines, AFAICT. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Colin Paice Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 4:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Amode 64 JSON library

Re: Amode 64 JSON library?

Are you using Linkage stub method (Recommended) Use the linkable stub routine HWTJCSS from SYS1.CSSLIB to link edit yourobject code.

Amode 64 JSON library?

I am investigating the implications of converting a large body of C code to 64 bit. Compiling with LP64 seems straightforward, the problems are at the binder step. I am currently getting IEW2469E Reason 3: "Either the reference or the target is in amode 64 and the amodes do not match." This I