Hi Esmie,
Did you receive any replies? I still have a problem with my account when I
don't receive posts.
From: esmie moo
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 1:45:04 PM
Subject: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED DSNS
ATTEMPTING ALTER
Hi Esmie,
Did you receive any replies? I still have a problem with my account when I
don't receive posts.
From: esmie moo
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 1:45:04 PM
Subject: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED
: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED DSNS WHILE ATTEMPTING ALTER
Good Afternoon Gentle Readers,
I am altering a large amount of gdg dsns which are migrated. :
/*
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT
er my
question.
Thank you for asking.
From: willie bunter
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:04:39 PM
Subject: Re: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED DSNS WHILE ATTEMPTING ALTER
Hi Esmie,
Did you receive any replies? I still have a pr
hope someone can answer my question.
Thank you for asking.
From: willie bunter
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:04:39 PM
Subject: Re: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED DSNS WHILE ATTEMPTING ALTER
Hi Esmie,
Did you receive any replies? I
Hi,
sorry to say it's still only mgmtclas and storclas that can be ams altered on a
migrated dataset without forcing a recall.
Hopefully you can recall them without filling up your sms pools!
And because you have updated the catalog entry they will end up being
physically migrated again even if y
Ed Gould
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:04 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED DSNS WHILE ATTEMPTING ALTER
>
> Esmie:
>
> I think this was discussed a while ago (20+ years ago) at a GUIDE
> session.
> IBM insisted that the
Thanks Steve for clearing this up.
From: Steve Thompson
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:35:09 PM
Subject: Re: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED DSNS WHILE ATTEMPTING ALTER
From: esmie moo
Date: 01/31/2013 04:22 PM
Willie,
No
esmie moo wrote:
>I am altering a large amount of gdg dsns which are migrated.
>So it looks like the recall has to be done in order to process those files.
Do something like this, hopefully after hours:
IKJEFT - Recall say 500 dsn in one SYSIN.
Do your IDCAMS ALTER job with one SYSIN for all t
Elardus,
That is what I did. I recalled the dsns then I did the ALTER command. Thanks
for the tip.
From: Elardus Engelbrecht
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2013 8:29:44 AM
Subject: Re: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED DSNS WHILE
n.
> From: esmie moo
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 1:45:04 PM
> Subject: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED DSNS WHILE ATTEMPTING ALTER
>
> Good Afternoon Gentle Readers,
>
> I am altering a large amount of gdg dsns which are migrated. :
&g
That is an interesting question, and something that's been bugging me since the
OP first posted.
If you create a +1 SMS-managed GDG with DISP=(NEW,KEEP), the system will create
a data set with the next G00V00 sequenced number. But if that data set is
*not* rolled in before you create (+1) ag
all of these "in" is an exercise in futility since the
GDG base limit is 255.
Regards,
Hervey
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Greg Shirey
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 3:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.
On Feb 1, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hervey Martinez
wrote:
> Assuming that all these gdg files belong to the "same gdg base"; it's
> possible that the GDG base was defined with a "noscratch"; then, when a gdg
> is "rolled off" then the file would not get deleted just detached from the
> base but stay
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:45:04 -0800, esmie moo wrote:
>Good Afternoon Gentle Readers,
�
I am altering a large amount of gdg dsns which are migrated.� :
�
This thread moves me to a (possibly) naive philosophical question
from a remote perspective. (I like to keep a safe distance from z/OS
internals
On Feb 1, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Good Afternoon Gentle Readers,
�
I am altering a large amount of gdg dsns which are migrated.� :
�
This thread moves me to a (possibly) naive philosophical question
from a remote perspective. (I like to keep a safe distance from z/OS
internals -
mp; Basic Admin - Boston - MAY 21-23
- Securing z/OS UNIX - WebEx - JUL 23-25
-
-Original Message-
Date:Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:45:04 -0800
From:esmie moo
Subject: BYPASSING RECALL OF MIGRATED DSNS WHILE ATTEMPTI
Hello Esmie,
GDG defined as NOEMPTY will ROLL-OFF the older members as you create +1 GDG
members.
With the maximum number of members in a GDG set as 256, only the latest 256
memebrs are connected (ROLLIN) to the GDG BASE catalog entry. ALl others are
cataloged by their explicit name, and canno
correction.
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:03:18 -0600, Bruce Hewson
wrote:
>Hello Esmie,
>
>GDG defined as NOSCRATCH will ROLL-OFF the older members as you create +1 GDG
>members.
>
>With the maximum number of members in a GDG set as 256, only the latest 256
>memebrs are connected (ROLLIN) to the GDG
19 matches
Mail list logo
