Check SMF99 subtype 5 for storage target. SRM manages to a storage target
which is set in a complex way if you are not using storage critical, but
aims to keep interactive work responsive. Your CICS regions may be
mis-categorized for this purpose. This storage target is enforced
pre-emptively
A word in advance: I have subscribed to the MXG-L list but have not yet granted
access, so I'm asking here first.
I'm busy working on a problem some of CICS region are suffering from
periodically. There are times when some CICS regions are paging-in some MB of
storage and are thus suffering
o:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 6:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CICS suffering from Page-In delay: Page Stealing versus Paging Out
A word in advance: I have subscribed to the MXG-L list but have not yet granted
access, so I'm asking here fir
, 2015 07:35
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: CICS suffering from Page-In delay: Page Stealing versus Paging Out
A word in advance: I have subscribed to the MXG-L list but have not yet granted
access, so I'm asking here first.
I'm busy working
> There is an option in the WLM to make a service class memory critical.
Yes, I know and I have verified that we do *not* used it. Why? Good question
that I will have to raise. I'm very astonished the CICSs are not set storage
critical. But I'm new to this installation and don't know
