@Peter, great, thanks!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 4:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CPOOL DELETE in a cleanup situation
>Is there a CPID va
>Is there a CPID value (such as zero or minus one) that never occurs in
>real life that I could use as an initialization value so that the code
>"knew" not to issue a CPOOL DELETE?
While what Jim wrote is of course correct, I'd suggest that you use 0 and
submit a request to ask to update the do
Thanks @Jim.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 10:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CPOOL DELETE in a cleanup situation
> I am re-working code that doe
> I am re-working code that does a CPOOL DELETE in what *could be* a
"cleanup"
> type situation where the exact state of things is unknown. Is there a
CPID
> value (such as zero or minus one) that never occurs in real life that I
> could use as an initialization value so that the code "knew" not
I am re-working code that does a CPOOL DELETE in what *could be* a "cleanup"
type situation where the exact state of things is unknown. Is there a CPID
value (such as zero or minus one) that never occurs in real life that I
could use as an initialization value so that the code "knew" not to issue a
