Re: Controlling TCPIP performance

2017-03-30 Thread Rob Schramm
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Controlling TCPIP performance > > Wouldn't that be determined by the priority of the application rather than > by the TCPIP task? In this case, the FTP client or server. > Bart > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Li

Re: Controlling TCPIP performance

2017-03-23 Thread Steve Beaver
: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Controlling TCPIP performance Wouldn't that be determined by the priority of the application rather than by the TCPIP task? In this case, the FTP client or server. Bart -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: Controlling TCPIP performance

2017-03-23 Thread van der Grijn, Bart (B)
:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Controlling TCPIP performance For obvious reasons we want to run the TCPIP address at a very high dispatching priority. There are times though when we want to throttle back certain functions of the TCPIP stack. I will use FTP as the immediate example

Re: Controlling TCPIP performance

2017-03-23 Thread Allan Staller
Class of Service. Check the TCPIP books... HTH, -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tracy Adams Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 2:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Controlling TCPIP performance For obvious

Controlling TCPIP performance

2017-03-23 Thread Tracy Adams
For obvious reasons we want to run the TCPIP address at a very high dispatching priority. There are times though when we want to throttle back certain functions of the TCPIP stack. I will use FTP as the immediate example. I really don’t want a file transfer to dominate the system :-) TIA