o.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: "Vernooij, CP - SPLXM"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 01/23/2013 11:54 PM
Subject:Re: Coupling facility - Non Volatile performance
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Barbara,
I would have expected you to mention option 3.
-...@gmx.net
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 07:28
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Coupling facility - Non Volatile performance
> >Due to IBM Health checker report we have to change mode of our
Coupling facility to non Volatile.. CF is running in a partition on CPC,
shared by 4 z/OS
> >Due to IBM Health checker report we have to change mode of our Coupling
> >facility to non Volatile.. CF is running in a partition on CPC, shared by 4
> >z/OS LPARs making it a sysplex. We are enabled for CICSPlex , DB2 Data
> >sharing, RACF Database Sharing, SMSPlex, Catalog ECS etc etc.
Thanks Roger
We have very good UPS.. and have decided to make CF mode Non volatile.. Just
read somewhere that non volatile CF has better performance than Volatile ..but
there is no ROTs or any indicative relative perfomance figure or how to measure
/ monitor it..
Best Regards Munif.
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:04:40 -0600, Munif Sadek wrote:
>
>Due to IBM Health checker report we have to change mode of our Coupling
>facility to non Volatile.. CF is running in a partition on CPC, shared by 4
>z/OS LPARs making it a sysplex. We are enabled for CICSPlex , DB2 Data
>sharing, RA
Dear Listers,
Due to IBM Health checker report we have to change mode of our Coupling
facility to non Volatile.. CF is running in a partition on CPC, shared by 4
z/OS LPARs making it a sysplex. We are enabled for CICSPlex , DB2 Data sharing,
RACF Database Sharing, SMSPlex, Catalog ECS etc e
