In , on 12/24/2013
at 09:46 PM, Clark Morris said:
>Subject line says it all. My understanding of most discussions here
>is that the answer is yes.
The answer is different for ZIIP and ZAAP.
>Then the second question is whether this
>is logically code that would have run authorized anyway?
zAAP runs unauthorized. Only IBM has access to placing workload onto these
processors.
Vendors can run on zIIP. IBM doesn't want customer code on zIIP so IBM
arbitrarily decided to require running as a special SRB that only authorized
vendors have been told how to access it. Because customers w
On 24 Dec 2013 15:25:48 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Subject line says it all. My understanding of most discussions here
is that the answer is yes. Then the second question is whether this
is logically code that would have run authorized anyway?
Clark Morris
>In <8p0ka91p0u2h3skg8
