@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HMC REXX for Automating LPAR Controls (IMFEXEC)
AFAIK the BCPii is not old enough.
Last, but not least: Netview is not default component. I would be nice to
better define the environment you have. BTW: does it has to be REXX?
AFAIK using C/C++ the BCPii is available on z/OS 1.x
I met such case recently..however, I'm not good at Automation, or Rexx..
Hence I proposed "LPAR GROUP CONTROL' on HMC...which is a different
thing/think for capacity management..[compare to changing weights by hand]..
,so it is not accepted..
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Rob JACKSON wrote:
>
Mary Anne Matyaz
Sent: 03 December 2013 20:11
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HMC REXX for Automating LPAR Controls (IMFEXEC)
Rob,
BCPii Rexx is only available on z/OS 2.1. If you're not 2.1 yet, you could
write an assembler program that issues BCPii commands. If CA OPS is your
autom
December 2013 20:11
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HMC REXX for Automating LPAR Controls (IMFEXEC)
Rob,
BCPii Rexx is only available on z/OS 2.1. If you're not 2.1 yet, you could
write an assembler program that issues BCPii commands. If CA OPS is your
automation package you may
Rob,
BCPii Rexx is only available on z/OS 2.1. If you're not 2.1 yet, you could
write an assembler program that issues BCPii commands. If
CA OPS is your automation package you may have some options there.
MA
--
For IBM-MAIN s
Rob JACKSON wrote:
>I have been asked to provide support for the creation, as part of an
>Automation process, a REXX exec, that has a timed execution schedule,
>triggered by an automation rule. The REXX will perform HMC 'Change LPAR
>controls' in effect.
Where will that REXX run? TSO? Batch?
I have been asked to provide support for the creation, as part of an Automation
process, a REXX exec, that has a timed execution schedule, triggered by an
automation rule. The REXX will perform HMC 'Change LPAR controls' in effect.
The process presently occurs 'MANUALLY' on a daily basis to ad
