VSAM? No IMS / DB2 overhead.
Datacom? PS-FB.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:08 PM Pierre Fichaud wrote:
>
> I think in most cases, the database will be local.
>
> Assuming local, is access faster using DFSRRC00 or ODBA.
>
> If not local, what is faster?
>
> Thnx, Pierre
>
>
I think in most cases, the database will be local.
Assuming local, is access faster using DFSRRC00 or ODBA.
If not local, what is faster?
Thnx, Pierre
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
If the database is local, ODBC will slow it down. DFSRRC00 is batch
oriented ( may run with TM/DBCTL as well).
The question you need to answer is where the database is.
ITschak
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous
If the database is local, ODBC will slow it down. DFSRRC00 is batch
oriented ( may run with TM/DBCTL as well).
The question you need to answer is where the database is.
ITschak
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous
To All,
My IMS is somewhat limited and my terminology may be incorrect.
Is there a performance difference between 1) executing DFSRRC00 and 2)
executing an assembler program that uses ODBA calls ?
1) An assembler routine and a PSB name would be provided to DFSRRC00.
I'm not
