Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Lizette Koehler
are always light, it may not delete anything for a really long time. Lizette -Original Message- >From: Tony Thigpen <t...@vse2pdf.com> >Sent: Jan 18, 2017 3:30 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: IMS log files question > >I am thinking that my bes

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Tony Thigpen
through DFSMS and DFSMShsm. They will probably be faster Lizette -Original Message- From: Lizette Koehler <stars...@mindspring.com> Sent: Jan 18, 2017 2:03 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IMS log files question The HSM Started task has an ARCCMDxx member that detai

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Tony Thigpen
UA.EDU Subject: Re: IMS log files question The HSM Started task has an ARCCMDxx member that details all the stuff it is to do. You can issue a F dfhsmstcnamehere,Q SETSYS and see what is currently running. You can browse the ARCCMDxx member and see what it is going to do.

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Tony Thigpen
e what the policies are for the dataset (you only provided a snippet of the details. Use the DISPLAY function in ISMF for easier read -Original Message- From: Tony Thigpen <t...@vse2pdf.com> Sent: Jan 18, 2017 12:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IMS log files questi

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Lizette Koehler
LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: IMS log files question > >The HSM Started task has an ARCCMDxx member that details all the stuff it is >to do. > >You can issue a F dfhsmstcnamehere,Q SETSYS and see what is currently >running. > >You can browse the ARCCMDxx member a

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Lizette Koehler
gt; >Sent: Jan 18, 2017 12:00 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: IMS log files question > >How do I determine if the volume is part of the HSM backup process? I >have looked at the HSM backup logs and these volumes are never mentioned >although other volumes

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Tony Thigpen
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IMS log files question Which makes since. It is using the "larger of [JCL vs SMS]" & <= RET_LIMIT. So, I am back to my original problem. I

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Rugen, Len
, 2017 9:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IMS log files question See if DFHSM is running space management process on those volumes/pools. Or you can check on the IMS List and see if someone over there has had a similar issue To join, if you have not done so, use this URL IMS

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Lizette Koehler
m: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Tony Thigpen > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:52 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IMS log files question > > From the job logs where the file is created: > > //DFSSLOGP DD DS

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Lizette Koehler
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Tony Thigpen > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:30 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IMS log files question > > Which makes since. It is using the

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Tony Thigpen
ike your RETPD=45 is overriding the SMS parameters. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IMS log files question From t

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Burrell, Todd
Looks like your RETPD=45 is overriding the SMS parameters. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IMS log files question

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-18 Thread Tony Thigpen
From the job logs where the file is created: //DFSSLOGP DD DSN=IMSVS.SLDSP.%SSID.D%ARDATE.T%ARTIME.V%ARVERS, // DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE),RETPD=45, // UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=SIMS00,SPACE=(CYL,(1,1)) IGD101I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME (DFSSLOGP) DSN

AW: Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-17 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> I am reviewing the system VTOCs and I see a lot of IMS log files that > contain a date/timestamp in their names. I know they are created by > the IMS system using the skeleton proc member ARCHJCL. What I am > seeing is that the file was created with a retention period of 45 days. > > //DFSSLOGP

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-17 Thread Rich Tabor
IMS itself does not take any action automatically. Since the logs are as close to a complete audit trail for any user interaction with the IMS system, they might need special handling from a retention stand point. From a database recovery perspective, if the DBRC RECON data set for the IMS

Re: IMS log files question

2017-01-17 Thread Lizette Koehler
that specifies something other than 45 days. Some products will determine their own time to expire datasets. Lizette -Original Message- >From: Tony Thigpen <t...@vse2pdf.com> >Sent: Jan 17, 2017 5:05 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: IMS log files quest

IMS log files question

2017-01-17 Thread Tony Thigpen
Can someone point me in the right direction? I am reviewing the system VTOCs and I see a lot of IMS log files that contain a date/timestamp in their names. I know they are created by the IMS system using the skeleton proc member ARCHJCL. What I am seeing is that the file was created with a