Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-24 Thread Ron Hawkins
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Improve LLA/VLF usage Skip: I think you are on the money. From 30 years of looking at SMF records the excp counts for load libraries are notoriously under reported. Ed On Feb 18, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Skip Robinson wrote: > FREEZE is indeed the 'culprit

Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-19 Thread Leonardo Vaz
Wow, thank you everyone for your replies! I will do that for a development system. My hope is not high, but let's see if we get any measurable performance improvement. Really appreciated, Leonardo Vaz -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-19 Thread Martin Packer
02/19/2013 05:12 AM Subject: Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List Skip: I think you are on the money. From 30 years of looking at SMF records the excp counts for load libraries are notoriously under reported. Ed On Feb 18, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Skip Robin

Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-19 Thread Yifat Oren
Did you mean 42 subtype 6? Yifat -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ron Hawkins Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 11:04 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage Leonardo, Try the Type 64 subtype

Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-19 Thread Ron Hawkins
A.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Improve LLA/VLF usage Skip: I think you are on the money. From 30 years of looking at SMF records the excp counts for load libraries are notoriously under reported. Ed On Feb 18, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Skip Robinson wrote: > FREEZE is indeed the 'culprit'

Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-18 Thread Ed Gould
, Date: 02/18/2013 06:06 AM Subject: Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List m...@listserv.ua.edu> Thank you very much for expressing your opinion Skip, I am aware and I agree that LLA can be a pain to manage, maybe even worse than a linklist dataset

Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-18 Thread Skip Robinson
323-715-0595 Mobile jo.skip.robin...@sce.com From: Leonardo Vaz To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, Date: 02/18/2013 06:06 AM Subject: Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List Thank you very much for expressing your opinion Skip, I am aware and I agree that

Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-18 Thread Leonardo Vaz
, February 15, 2013 5:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage However you finally select candidates, be aware of some behavior changes that *other* folks in your shop may find disturbing. Not to mention *yourself* later on down the road. A library managed by LLA will

Re: Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-15 Thread Skip Robinson
ce.com From: Leonardo Vaz To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, Date: 02/15/2013 01:13 PM Subject:Improve LLA/VLF usage Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List Hello All, I was looking into improving performance by placing load libraries that have a high quantity of fetches

Improve LLA/VLF usage

2013-02-15 Thread Leonardo Vaz
Hello All, I was looking into improving performance by placing load libraries that have a high quantity of fetches in LLA/VLF. I was thinking on using SMF type 14 records to find out the good candidates. Is that a good idea? Any other ideas on how I could find out the most used load libraries?