f of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
Whom were you quoting with the ">>"?
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 06:38:53 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>&g
Whom were you quoting with the ">>"?
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 06:38:53 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>>
>> I remember, long, long ago at a shop far, far away; that I allowed a TSO
>> user to log on multiple times by using IKJEFLD1 to suppress the issuing of
>> the standard ENQ. I don't recall how I
Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
kekronbekron [02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 2:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
Having multiple sessions going on in a single terminal window
>
> I remember, long, long ago at a shop far, far away; that I allowed a TSO
> user to log on multiple times by using IKJEFLD1 to suppress the issuing of
> the standard ENQ. I don't recall how I handled the ISPF profiles so that
> there weren't any problems. I guess, today, I could use a PDSe.
;
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
> From: "PINION, RICHARD W." rpin...@firsthorizon.com
> Date: Mon, April 19, 2021 11:21 am
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> I wonder if it would be possible for Tom Brennen to
understand the partition chapter in the 3270 data stream
manual (I could not).
Original Message
Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
From: "PINION, RICHARD W."
Date: Mon, April 19, 2021 11:21 am
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
I wonder if it would be possible for T
: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
You configured the 3174 controller to use 4 of it's ports to support 4
different LUs on the same coax, and it had to be in DFT mode. Then I think the
4 LU's were configurable to whatever screen size you wanted, but you might have
had to give up some
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
I wonder if it would be possible for Tom Brennen to add support for a 3290
device?
I wonder if ISPF SPLITV, 3290, and TN3270E are even a possibility, as the
3290/3x74
combination was a SNA thing??? I have no idea, as I can't even spell
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
David Cole
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 2:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
[External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments.]
PCOMM would have to support the "3290"
PCOMM would have to support the "3290" terminal type. I don't use
PCOMM, so I don't actually know if it does or not, but I would be
amazed if it did.
Anyway, as someone else noted, SPLITV is supported in ISPF only for
"3290" types, so the answer to your question would be No. It can't be done.
character being
repainted.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Wendell Lovewell
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 9:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
You configured the 3174 controller to use 4
You configured the 3174 controller to use 4 of it's ports to support 4
different LUs on the same coax, and it had to be in DFT mode. Then I think the
4 LU's were configurable to whatever screen size you wanted, but you might have
had to give up some of the 3290's memory to get the 160 by ?
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 12:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
Would you mind showing us an example of how to set this up with pcomm, for
example?
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
>
> Interesting! So now I'm wondering how consoles from 3 different LPARs
> appeared on the same screen, plus a spare with a VTAM welcome message.
> At the time I thought all our consoles were direct connecti
split in ISPF?
Only 1 coax cable to a 3290. It was a DFT device (distributed function
terminal). They were more of an SNA device and not sure they functioned as
non-sna from what I remember
Kenneth A. Bloom
Avenir Technologies Inc
/d/b/a Visara International
203-984-2235
bl...@visara.com<mailto
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom
Brennan [t...@tombrennansoftware.com]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 7:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
Interesting! So now I'm wondering how consoles
That's it! Thanks
On 4/16/2021 5:19 PM, Lloyd Fuller wrote:
1 connection 4 addresses on 3274 according to the data sheet. So three LPARs
plus VTAM screen would be possible.
Lloyd
Sent from AT Yahoo Mail for iPad
On Friday, April 16, 2021, 7:53 PM, Tom Brennan
wrote:
Interesting! So
1 connection 4 addresses on 3274 according to the data sheet. So three LPARs
plus VTAM screen would be possible.
Lloyd
Sent from AT Yahoo Mail for iPad
On Friday, April 16, 2021, 7:53 PM, Tom Brennan
wrote:
Interesting! So now I'm wondering how consoles from 3 different LPARs
appeared
Interesting! So now I'm wondering how consoles from 3 different LPARs
appeared on the same screen, plus a spare with a VTAM welcome message.
At the time I thought all our consoles were direct connections (defined
as unit addresses).
It was a long time ago so this could have been a dream or
Only 1 coax cable to a 3290. It was a DFT device (distributed function
terminal). They were more of an SNA device and not sure they functioned as
non-sna from what I remember
Kenneth A. Bloom
Avenir Technologies Inc
/d/b/a Visara International
203-984-2235
We had one 3290 where I worked, and my guess it was an IBM promotion or
perhaps ordered by someone who found they didn't like it. So it ended
up in the tape room where it saved desk space by combining consoles for
3 LPARs with a single TSO session. I'm pretty sure it had 4 coax
cables, so in
du/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Steve Smith [sasd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 5:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there a vertical split in ISPF?
The 3290 added what I think
ISPF SPLITV only works on 3290s.
Joe
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:43 PM Bob Bridges wrote:
> Somewhere in the dim reaches of my past I think I saw mention of the
> ability to split an ISPF screen vertically rather than horizontally. I've
> never tried it, and I'm not sure I didn't just
The 3290 added what I think was called "DFT", or "partitioned mode" to the
3270 protocol, and allowed a smart application (afaik, ISPF is the only
application that smart) to divide up the screen into several logical
screens. The ISPF SPLITV command implemented that. Maybe some TN3270 apps
can
Maybe you're thinking XEDIT?
On 2021-04-16 16:43, Bob Bridges wrote:
Somewhere in the dim reaches of my past I think I saw mention of the ability to
split an ISPF screen vertically rather than horizontally. I've never tried it,
and I'm not sure I didn't just imagine the capability.
But
On 4/16/2021 1:43 PM, Bob Bridges wrote:
Somewhere in the dim reaches of my past I think I saw mention of the ability to
split an ISPF screen vertically rather than horizontally. I've never tried it,
and I'm not sure I didn't just imagine the capability.
I used to have a 3290 "gas" panel
Somewhere in the dim reaches of my past I think I saw mention of the ability to
split an ISPF screen vertically rather than horizontally. I've never tried it,
and I'm not sure I didn't just imagine the capability.
But today someone asked me how to split the screen more than once, and in the
27 matches
Mail list logo
