Re: Limit on parallel TSO User address spaces started via CEA

2013-02-11 Thread nitz-...@gmx.net
I think those are arbitrary limits, for the purpose of preventing an errant program or user from using too many address spaces, and also for allocating the storage for the table which is used to keep track of these address spaces. Do you have a scenario where these limits would be too low

Re: Limit on parallel TSO User address spaces started via CEA

2013-02-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 02:50:14 -0500, Jim Mulder wrote: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 02/11/2013 02:09:58 AM: From: nitz To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu, Date: 02/11/2013 02:17 AM The CEA TSO/E address space manager can create up to 10 concurrent address spaces

Re: Limit on parallel TSO User address spaces started via CEA

2013-02-11 Thread nitz-...@gmx.net
gil, Does this count address spaces started by syscall fork() when OMVS runs under TSO? Does syscall fork() use the CEATsoRequest API under the covers? If so, then yes. Does it count adress spaces started by USS Rexx address TSO? Does USS Rexx address TSO use the CEATsoRequest API under the

Re: Limit on parallel TSO User address spaces started via CEA

2013-02-11 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 02/11/2013 11:33:10 PM: Does this count address spaces started by syscall fork() when OMVS runs under TSO? Does syscall fork() use the CEATsoRequest API under the covers? If so, then yes. Does it count adress spaces

Re: Limit on parallel TSO User address spaces started via CEA

2013-02-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 23:38:03 -0500, Jim Mulder wrote: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 02/11/2013 11:33:10 PM: Does this count address spaces started by syscall fork() when OMVS runs under TSO? Does syscall fork() use the CEATsoRequest API under the covers? If

Re: Limit on parallel TSO User address spaces started via CEA

2013-02-11 Thread nitz-...@gmx.net
Even when Rexx under z/OS Unix System Services creates the address space in order to start another instance of the TSO TMP? And I forgot to ask the obvious question: Does this count address spaces used to EXEC PGM=IKJEF* in batch? gil, please read MVS Programming: Callable Services for

Limit on parallel TSO User address spaces started via CEA

2013-02-10 Thread nitz-...@gmx.net
Does anyone know why the number of TSO user address spaces that can be started in any given lpar via CEA services is limited to 50? MVS Programming: Callable Services for High-Level Languages is fairly firm in stating this: The CEA TSO/E address space manager can create up to 10 concurrent

Re: Limit on parallel TSO User address spaces started via CEA

2013-02-10 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 02/11/2013 02:09:58 AM: From: nitz-...@gmx.net nitz-...@gmx.net To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu, Date: 02/11/2013 02:17 AM Subject: Limit on parallel TSO User address spaces started via CEA Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List