W dniu 2015-08-29 o 03:59, David Crayford pisze:
On 29/08/2015 5:56 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
http://mainframesproject.tumblr.com/
That really is a hall of shame! If you can access telnet then you can
disrupt the system with a DDoS attack.
Not every system is production system. Not every produ
ERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Scott Ford
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframes open to internet attacks?
I think the dude who wrote to article was looking for money or being a
name in the industry. Every Z system I have been on you could not get
u can
> disrupt the system with a DDoS attack.
>
> >
> > Charles
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Scott Ford
> > Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 1:42 PM
> >
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframes open to internet attacks?
I think the dude who wrote to article was looking for money or being a name in the
industry. Every Z system I have been on you could not get to a
http://mainframesproject.tumblr.com/
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframes open to internet attacks?
I think
I think the dude who wrote to article was looking for money or being a name
in the industry. Every Z system I have been on you could not get to a
login screen that easy. That's about 20+ shops , so dude give us details no
"fluff"
Scott
On Friday, August 28, 2015, R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2015-08-2
W dniu 2015-08-28 o 14:12, John McKown pisze:
The die hard AmigaDOS people will be wanting an apology for being ignored
-- yet again. The CP/M people have all died, so no worries from them.
[grin].
Well, I still have working CP/M machine and feel quite alive. However I
never tried to conne
open to internet attacks?
In <55df2edd.5090...@bremultibank.com.pl>, on 08/27/2015
at 05:38 PM, "R.S." said:
>What I understod from the lecture:
>a) mainframes are old, obsolete, but unfotunately sometimes still in
>use - which is a sin.
If they do the job as well as
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 3:02 AM, R.S.
wrote:
> W dniu 2015-08-28 o 06:19, Timothy Sipples pisze:
>
>> Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>>
>>> c) IMHO it is bad idea to make any system directly accessible from
>>> Internet. Mainframe, any kind of Unix, Linux, Windows...
>>>
>> Which leaves...what? Is Wang
W dniu 2015-08-28 o 06:19, Timothy Sipples pisze:
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
c) IMHO it is bad idea to make any system directly accessible from
Internet. Mainframe, any kind of Unix, Linux, Windows...
Which leaves...what? Is Wang still selling machines? (But those were
systems, too...)
Well...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Phil
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 8:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframes open to internet attacks?
Hi All,
I’m actually the person interviewed in this (f
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com (Mike Schwab) writes:
> How about Multics? Designed from the start to be multi-user and
> highly secure.
some of the CTSS people went to the 5th flr and did Multics. Other of
the CTSS people went to the IBM science center on the 4th flr and did
cp67/cms, the internal netwo
feel free
to email me if you have questions or concerns (or are interested in how I did
it).
Phil
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 9:00 PM, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system
> wrote:
>
> Date:Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:38:05 +0200
> From:"R.S." <mailto:r.skoru...@bremult
How about Multics? Designed from the start to be multi-user and highly secure.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
> Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>>c) IMHO it is bad idea to make any system directly accessible from
>>Internet. Mainframe, any kind of Unix, Linux, Windows...
>
> W
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>c) IMHO it is bad idea to make any system directly accessible from
>Internet. Mainframe, any kind of Unix, Linux, Windows...
Which leaves...what? Is Wang still selling machines? (But those were
systems, too...)
In <55df2edd.5090...@bremultibank.com.pl>, on 08/27/2015
at 05:38 PM, "R.S." said:
>What I understod from the lecture:
>a) mainframes are old, obsolete, but unfotunately sometimes still in
>use - which is a sin.
If they do the job as well as or better than available alternatives
then they're
W dniu 2015-08-19 o 00:26, Robert Harrison pisze:
>From technologyreview.com:
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainframe-computers-that-handle-our-most-sensitive-data-are-open-to-internet-attacks/
Really?
What I understod from the lecture:
a) mainframes are old, obsolete, but unfot
@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Vince Coen
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 19/08/2015 14:22
Subject: Re: Mainframes open to internet attacks?
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discuss
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Vince Coen wrote:
> Err you have to read this a little closer :
>
> " leaders of the U.S. office of personal management .. explain "
>
>
> So these people experienced it, what exactly ?
>
> Knowledge of any form of IT !! ?
>
> There again could have down a simple
acilitated a hack on sensitive data?
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Meir Zohar
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframes open t
PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframes open to internet attacks?
Phil Young has been doing these talks for several years and some of the tools
are posted on his Soldier of Fortran site.
He is absolutely correct in that some sites are complacent in their "the
mainframe is secur
:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Robert Harrison
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 1:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframes open to internet attacks?
>From technologyreview.com:
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainframe-computers-that-handle-our-most-sensitive
V.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Robert Harrison
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 3:27 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Mainframes open to internet attacks?
>
> From technologyreview.com:
>
>
> http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainframe-com
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Robert Harrison
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 3:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframes open to internet attacks?
>From technologyreview.com:
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainfr
>>> On 8/18/2015 at 06:26 PM, Robert Harrison
>>> wrote:
> From technologyreview.com:
>
> http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainframe-computers-that-handle-
> our-most-sensitive-data-are-open-to-internet-attacks/
It's fun to read the comments on that article, denying that there's any
>>> On 8/18/2015 at 06:26 PM, Robert Harrison
>>> wrote:
> From technologyreview.com:
>
> http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainframe-computers-that-handle-
> our-most-sensitive-data-are-open-to-internet-attacks/
>
> Really?
Yes, really. Phil Young isn't the only one that talks abo
From technologyreview.com:
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/540011/mainframe-computers-that-handle-our-most-sensitive-data-are-open-to-internet-attacks/
Really?
Robert Harrison
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
27 matches
Mail list logo
