Re: Question re: MXG-L post "common storage usage question"

2017-07-10 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Peter Hunkeler wrote: >> Wasn't this asked here recently? Check the archives. >Sorry, I missed that one. My excuse is: Been on holiday :-)-- But does that discussion started by Rex Pommier relates to that two APARs? Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---

Re: Question re: MXG-L post "common storage usage question"

2017-07-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> Wasn't this asked here recently? Check the archives. Sorry, I missed that one. My excuse is: Been on holiday :-)-- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listse

Re: Question re: MXG-L post "common storage usage question"

2017-07-10 Thread Tom Marchant
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:43:00 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote: >Below text was posted on MXG-L recently. It made me curious, so I tired >to read the APARs mentioned. Unfortunately, IBM's support site does not >have them (for public access) anymore. >Can someone shed some light on this? What was the o

Re: Question re: MXG-L post "common storage usage question"

2017-07-10 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Peter Hunkeler wrote: >Below text was posted on MXG-L recently. It made me curious, so I tired (sic) >to read the APARs mentioned. Unfortunately, IBM's support site does not have >them (for public access) anymore. Can someone shed some light on this? What >was the original problem? Why did it i

Question re: MXG-L post "common storage usage question"

2017-07-10 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Below text was posted on MXG-L recently. It made me curious, so I tired to read the APARs mentioned. Unfortunately, IBM's support site does not have them (for public access) anymore. Can someone shed some light on this? What was the original problem? Why did it increase CPU time for many STCs *o