On Fri, 24 May 2019 19:18:57 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Possible, but there are some discrepancies.
>
> 1. Why would he write a program instead of using an IBM utility?
>
I did that once on a 1401 where there was no IBM utility. It was to print
a CDC tape with idiosyncratic blocking. I share
metz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mark Regan
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Queue-less | Shark Tank Computerworld
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1UFR-
The computer museum is still waiting to receive Sparkler FIlter's IBM 402.
https://mainframe.typepad.com/blog/2013/04/manufacturer-in-texas-still-relies-on-their-ibm-402.html
http://ibm-1401.info/402.html
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:48 PM Mark Regan wrote:
>
> https://www.computerworld.com/articl
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3396127/queue-less.html
Regards,
Mark Regan, USNR-Retired, Nationwide Insurance, Retired
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua
