Todd Burrell wrote:
>Hopefully this is not a stupid question - but
>is it possibly via RACF (maybe with DASDVOL)
>to allow a particular system to have only read
>access to a DASD volume? We have a need to
>possibly vary some devices onto a system in one
>plex while it is being updated on another p
Nice.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, 5:33 PM Marna WALLE wrote:
> I was thinking of possibly another method that you could look at...how
> about making that volume have a READ-ONLY attribute in HCD? Read up on
> this, as there are some restrictions.
>
> Marna WALLE
> z/OS System Installation and Migrat
I was thinking of possibly another method that you could look at...how about
making that volume have a READ-ONLY attribute in HCD? Read up on this, as
there are some restrictions.
Marna WALLE
z/OS System Installation and Migration
IBM Poughkeepsie
--
gt; (502) 476-2538 or 407-7266
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Rob Schramm
> Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 10:55 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] RACF protection of a v
-MAIN] RACF protection of a volume
Excellent point. I ran across this ( at the time it was a pesky problem )
which kept me from at least creating datasets on a SMS volume that's part of
another Cindy.
Rob Schramm
mail to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
The i
Excellent point. I ran across this ( at the time it was a pesky problem )
which kept me from at least creating datasets on a SMS volume that's part
of another Cindy.
Rob Schramm
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 10:37 PM Mike Schwab wrote:
> An SMS volume from a system without the volume defined to a st
An SMS volume from a system without the volume defined to a storage
group is pretty darn resistant. But they generally don't need this
kind of treatment.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:27 PM Todd Burrell wrote:
>
> Hopefully this is not a stupid question - but is it possibly via RACF (maybe
> with DAS
As I said this was probably a stupid question. I suspect that from what I have
seen MIM may be a solution, but we will look more.
Thanks for the info, Walt.
This email transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain CSX
privileged and confidential information intended only for t
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:27:25 -0500, Todd Burrell wrote:
>Hopefully this is not a stupid question - but is it possibly via RACF (maybe
>with DASDVOL) to allow a particular system to have only read access to a DASD
>volume? We have a need to possibly vary some devices onto a system in one
>plex
move data between the environments?
>
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of
> > Todd Burrell
> > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 3:27 PM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: R
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 3:27 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: RACF protection of a volume
>
> Hopefully this is not a stupid question - but is it possibly via RACF (maybe
> with DASDVOL) to allow a particular system to have only read access to a DASD
> volume? W
Hopefully this is not a stupid question - but is it possibly via RACF (maybe
with DASDVOL) to allow a particular system to have only read access to a DASD
volume? We have a need to possibly vary some devices onto a system in one plex
while it is being updated on another plex, so we would like t
12 matches
Mail list logo
