Back in 2000, someone, (Kriss Davis ), posed this question, (same subject as
above), but at that time there was no answer. I was wondering, in the 15
years that have passed, if IBM has developed a solution, or perhaps someone has
written a REXX to accomplish.
Here is the original post:
Kriss
I wrote a rexx once years ago to format and display a sequential file
respecting carriage controls. At the time it was to make the memo to users
from a CBPDO a little more readable. But as much as that document used '+'
to suppress spacing for bold and underlining, I couldn't make get it to
TBH, I haven't used IOF in about 17+ years now. But I thought even back then
it had an option
to honor CC when looking at spool output. Anyone?
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
ITIL v3 Foundation Certified
mailto:m...@mzelden.com
Mark's MVS
On 2015-08-11 14:13, Dana Mitchell wrote:
> I wrote a rexx once years ago to format and display a sequential file
> respecting carriage controls. At the time it was to make the memo to users
> from a CBPDO a little more readable. But as much as that document used '+'
> to suppress spacing fo
On 2015-08-11 14:13, Dana Mitchell wrote:
> I wrote a rexx once years ago to format and display a sequential file
> respecting carriage controls. At the time it was to make the memo to users
> from a CBPDO a little more readable. But as much as that document used '+'
> to suppress spacing fo
Would be nice. If you open an RFE I will vote for it!
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:38:11 +
> From: ren.bren...@bkfs.com
> Subject: SDSF and Carriage Control
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Back in 2000, someone, (Kriss Davis ), p
In <1867294601655777.wa.mitchdanagmail@listserv.ua.edu>, on
08/11/2015
at 03:13 PM, Dana Mitchell said:
>since obviously you can't simulate overstrike on a display.
Not obvious and not true, but the 3270 display stream doesn't support
it. However, it does support high intensity, which is
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 18:23:06 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
> on 08/11/2015 at 03:13 PM, Dana Mitchell said:
>
>>since obviously you can't simulate overstrike on a display.
>
>Not obvious and not true, but the 3270 display stream doesn't support
>it. However, it does support high intensi
Some of these .txt are recognizable on big screen. Haven't tried to print.
Probably a PG rating
_www.testfiles.com/art/DECUS/_ (http://www.testfiles.com/art/DECUS/)
In a message dated 8/13/2015 11:34:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu writes:
A
IOF does and has for at least 14 years support carriage control emulated
display (both RECFM=A or M), except for overprinting.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:26 PM Peter Hunkeler wrote:
> >Ah! Here it is!: >asa - Interpret ASA/FORTRAN carriage control
> But it's an incomplete implementation. Doesn't
IOF is a SPOOL display product from Fischer International
http://www.fisc.com/products/iof/ . Interactive Output Facility according
to the site. I have a vague memory of it. It is not an SDSF work-alike but,
back when I used it, it had some good features.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Peter Hun
Now I are confused.
http://www.triangle-systems.com/ioftech.shtml
The contact is for the same person at same number. Christine Carfgnoni
In a message dated 8/13/2015 3:04:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
john.archie.mck...@gmail.com writes:
http://www.fisc.com/products/iof/ . Interactive
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:03:44 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>IOF is a SPOOL display product from Fischer International
>http://www.fisc.com/products/iof/ . Interactive Output Facility according
>to the site. I have a vague memory of it. It is not an SDSF work-alike but,
>back when I used it, it had som
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: 13 August 2015 21:04
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF and Carriage Control
IOF is a SPOOL display product from Fischer International
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.fisc.com
>Is "-" part of the ASA standard or is it an IBMism? --
Peter Hunkeler
>It's pretty hard to find a definitive document. I'd have greater trust in one
>that wasn't published by IBM.
While reading RFC 959 (FTP) for some other reasons, I stumbled across the
following text:
3.1.1.5.2. CARRIAGE CON
>Ah! Here it is!: >asa - Interpret ASA/FORTRAN carriage control
But it's an incomplete implementation. Doesn't support the "-" (space 3 lines)
ASA CC.
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
>IOF does and has for at least 14 years support carriage control emulated
>display (both RECFM=A or M), except for overprinting.
Pardon my ignorance, but what is IOF?
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 21:26:11 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>>Ah! Here it is!: >asa - Interpret ASA/FORTRAN carriage control
>But it's an incomplete implementation. Doesn't support the "-" (space 3 lines)
>ASA CC.
>
Is "-" part of the ASA standard or is it an IBMism?
It's pretty hard to find a d
18 matches
Mail list logo
