> Might it be OA48512?
Looks so. Thanks
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
200 C8 SMF30HVO 8 binary Amount of
64-bit private storage in bytes that is obtained by
this step or job. This includes guarded virtual storage.
208
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
10/07/2015 09:51:47 AM:
> From: Peter Hunkeler
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 10/07/2015 09:51 AM
> Subject: What are SMF30 fields SMF30HVO and SMF30HVH telling me?
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>
> I've got
0 haystack for hints on what's going on.
I'm looking at the storage section and am having difficulties to understand
what SMF30HVO and SMF30HVH are telling me. I thought I had understood, but as I
see HVH values to be significantly higher than the HVO values, I'm confused.
I
martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com (Martin Packer) wrote:
Which is precisely why a decent MEMLIMIT / IEFUSI is so important:
...or, with z/OS V2.2, a well-specified set of limits in the new
SMFLIMxx parmlib member instead!
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com
: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: "Blaicher, Christopher Y."
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 20/08/2015 14:08
Subject: Re: SMF30HVO
Sent by:IBM
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 2:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF30HVO
I think 'obtained' should be read as 'getmained', but not still used
(referenced), so only the used/r
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Werner Kuehnel
Sent: 20 August, 2015 8:42
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF30HVO
Yes, I know, it's virtual. But I understand the word "obtained" as
allocate
usage (what I
don't see).
OA44690 doesn't apply to us, we still avoid working with PDS/Es and have
just a handful private libs, beside the z/OS PDSEs. Anyway, thanks for the
hint.
Werner Kuehnel
Von:"Staller, Allan"
An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Datum: 19.08
migration from z/OS 1.13 to 2.1 I see an increase for almost all address
spaces in field SMF30HVO (Storage and Paging section).
The book says about this field:
"SMF30HVO length 8binary Amount of 64-bit private storage in
bytes that is obtained by this step or job. This includes gu
After migration from z/OS 1.13 to 2.1 I see an increase for almost all
address spaces in field SMF30HVO (Storage and Paging section).
The book says about this field:
"SMF30HVO length 8binary Amount of 64-bit private storage in
bytes that is obtained by this step or job. This inc
11 matches
Mail list logo
