Re: SMP/E download anomaly

2024-04-22 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
> All cases, the CLIENT DD referenced the same PDS member. Then I cannot easily explain the observed behavior. If you want to pursue, then I suggest opening a support case and be prepared to supply the output for both a job that used HTTPS, and a job whose CLIENT DD uses the same PDS member

Re: SMP/E download anomaly

2024-04-22 Thread Norbert Gál
Hello Kurt, All cases, the CLIENT DD referenced the same PDS member. Regards, Norbert -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 5:03 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SMP/E download

Re: SMP/E download anomaly

2024-04-19 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
> I have an interesting case what I cannot untangle. I was creating multiple > ORDERSERVER using the same job where downloadmethod="https" is specified, > only the SMPCSI changed. For products like zSecure, MFA, AO, Netview, etc, > the job ran fine and downloaded relevant PTFs, however in case

SMP/E download anomaly

2024-04-19 Thread Norbert Gál
Hello I have an interesting case what I cannot untangle. I was creating multiple ORDERSERVER using the same job where downloadmethod="https" is specified, only the SMPCSI changed. For products like zSecure, MFA, AO, Netview, etc, the job ran fine and downloaded relevant PTFs, however in case