-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dumb SMPE question
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:51:39 -0800, Skip Robinson wrote
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:32:30 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 5:40 AM
... Or do what I do and
build the exclude list required to get RC=0.
Why even spend the time to do that? The result is the same, the
:Re: Dumb SMPE question
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:32:30 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 5:40 AM
... Or do what I do and
build
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:51:39 -0800, Skip Robinson wrote:
If no PTFs will APPLY in a particular effort, you're treated to a special
message and return code:
GIM24801S ** NO SYSMODS SATISFIED THE OPERANDS SPECIFIED ON THE APPLY
COMMAND.
GIM20501IAPPLY PROCESSING IS COMPLETE. THE HIGHEST RETURN
In
CAE6x8Q6u0p0-CXOnkOv=qp9uhfqm3uasggomnug5_c4dgob...@mail.gmail.com,
on 02/06/2014
at 04:11 PM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com said:
I hate having these PTFs in my SMPPTS that every time I install an
RSU the APPLY tries to install this PTF again, and I spend more
time researching why the
In
29b16432403d6c45a9bee5f0302d191721438...@vss-exchmb1.sfg.corp.LOCAL,
on 02/06/2014
at 10:42 PM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com said:
Let me ask a general question about IBM packaging. Does IBM ever
send a fixing PTF with a PRE(PE-PTF) instead of a SUP(PE-PTF)?
Often.
--
I hate having these PTFs in my SMPPTS that every time I install an
RSU the APPLY tries to install this PTF again, and I spend more
time researching why the PTF didn't APPLY.
Then stop researching them. The ones to worry about are the ACTION and
DOC holds.
I completely agree. If a PTF cannot
... Or do what I do and
build the exclude list required to get RC=0.
Why even spend the time to do that? The result is the same, the PTFs
don't get applied.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
--
For IBM-MAIN
I should probably go through the GLOBAL, identify all of these forlorn
lost souls, and put them out of their everlasting misery via REJECT.
The often neglected NOFMID DELETEFMID form of REJECT is your friend
here... if or when you decide to address that loose end.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM,
bottom posting
-Original Message-
From: Robert A. Rosenberg [mailto:hal9...@panix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 11:10 PM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Cc: Pommier, Rex
Subject: Re: Dumb SMPE question
At 22:42 + on 02/06/2014, Pommier, Rex wrote about Re: Dumb SMPE
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:55:27 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
That depends on if the fix PTF contains all the elements in the
PE-PTF or only some of them. If it contains all then it can SUP. If
it does not it must PRE to pick up the elements that it does not
contain - Note this can only occur if
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 5:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dumb SMPE question
... Or do what I do and
build the exclude list required
Well sort of yes. This PTF - UA70446
HDZ1D10 FIXC HELD AA41551 HDZ1D10 ++HOLD(HDZ1D10) FIXCAT FMID(HDZ1D10)
REASON(AA41551) RESOLVER(UA70446)
CATEGORY(IBM.Function.VSAM-RLS)
DATE(13266).
UA70446 ERR HELD AA43280 HDZ1D10 ++HOLD(UA70446) FMID(HDZ1D10)
REASON(AA43280) ERROR DATE(13347)
.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 1:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dumb SMPE question
Well sort of yes. This PTF - UA70446
HDZ1D10 FIXC HELD AA41551
Dave:
Interesting reply. This is old information but it still applies IMO.
I was applying TSOE CBPDO and ended up with 2400+ PTF's that wouldn't
go on. I would never have gotten the product to apply if I had done
the exclude list route.
The root cause was a missing VTIOC(?) ptf and the 2400+
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dumb SMPE question
Well sort of yes. This PTF - UA70446
HDZ1D10 FIXC HELD AA41551 HDZ1D10 ++HOLD(HDZ1D10
Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 02/06/2014 02:30 PM
Subject:Re: Dumb SMPE question
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dumb SMPE question
Well sort of yes. This PTF - UA70446
HDZ1D10 FIXC HELD AA41551 HDZ1D10 ++HOLD(HDZ1D10) FIXCAT FMID(HDZ1D10)
REASON
At 22:42 + on 02/06/2014, Pommier, Rex wrote about Re: Dumb SMPE question:
Mark,
Let me ask a general question about IBM packaging. Does IBM ever
send a fixing PTF with a PRE(PE-PTF) instead of a SUP(PE-PTF)? If
the fixing PTF has a PRE of the PTF you deleted, would you not be
causing
Is there a way to unreceive maintenance? I have about 50 PTFs in my
SMPPTS that will not APPLY for one reason or another. Is there a way to
remove these PTFs from my system?
--
The postings on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent
Mainline's positions or opinions
Mark D Pace
REJECT them.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to unreceive maintenance? I have about 50 PTFs in my
SMPPTS that will not APPLY for one reason or another. Is there a way to
remove these PTFs from my system?
--
The postings on this
The SMP/E panels are pretty good. You can REJECT FORFMID or SOURCEID or
individually. If they
become required down the road can always re RECEIVE.
In a message dated 2/5/2014 12:41:36 P.M. Central Standard Time,
john.archie.mck...@gmail.com writes:
REJECT them.
Thank you, Gentlemen.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
The SMP/E panels are pretty good. You can REJECT FORFMID or SOURCEID or
individually. If they
become required down the road can always re RECEIVE.
In a message dated 2/5/2014 12:41:36 P.M. Central
...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 02/05/2014 05:46 PM
Subject:Re: Dumb SMPE question
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:40:06 -0500, Mark Pace wrote:
Is there a way to unreceive maintenance? I have about 50 PTFs
What would be the fastest, easiest way to rebuild a TARGET zone?
Do you have a backup? If not, forget fastest and easiest; personally
I'd want to know the safest method. To that end, you really need to
receive and install DB2 V9 from scratch and build a new target zone.
Otherwise, how can
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:48:19 -0500, Richard Sandford rsandf...@healthplan.com
wrote:
What would be the fastest, easiest way to rebuild a TARGET zone?
It appears a product (DB2 v9) was accepted early last year and now I need to
put on some maintenance, but it looks like some *Merge operations
Thanks, everyone, for your responses.
Backups are gone, so I believe I'll use Kurt's suggestion, which is what I had
as a Plan D, and I'll be sure.
Rich Sandford
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On 8/22/12, Richard Sandford rsandf...@healthplan.com wrote:
Thanks, everyone, for your responses.
Backups are gone, so I believe I'll use Kurt's suggestion, which is what I
had as a Plan D, and I'll be sure.
Rich Sandford
What would be the fastest, easiest way to rebuild a TARGET zone?
It appears a product (DB2 v9) was accepted early last year and now I need to
put on some maintenance, but it looks like some *Merge operations have been
done and now the target zone looks way out of wack.
DLIB and DIST libraries
29 matches
Mail list logo
