Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-06-01 Thread Bill Ogden
All this discussion brings back long-ago memories. As a student, we had a 407 in the same room as a 1620 and a new 1410 was in the next room. I used a rather minimal Fortran on the 1620, Autocoder on the 1410 (and basic machine instructions on the 1410 when it was in 1401 mode). I had a student

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-06-01 Thread Seymour J Metz
: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 6:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") >From memory, the LEO (Lyons Electronic Office) computer of 1951/2 used decimal (not octal or hexadecimal) digits. I cannot find a reference to it, but this might help: h

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-31 Thread CM Poncelet
gt; Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 8:45 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") > > On Sun, 29 May 2022 17:11:33 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: > >> I have never programmed a Tab machine but here is what I know. >> >&g

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-31 Thread Ronald Wells
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Joel C. Ewing [jce.ebe...@cox.net] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 5:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") Just from the online pictures, the IBM 403 control board was definitely smaller (looks like maybe 66 vs. 80

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-31 Thread Seymour J Metz
z http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Joel C. Ewing [jce.ebe...@cox.net] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 5:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") Just

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-30 Thread Michael Phillips
Just stumbled upon this thread and can't resist a comment or two. In 1971 I went from "correspondence" training to 3 months "intensive training" at the College of Automation in Jacksonville FL... Yep, Now I know that was a pure scam, but I did learn how to wire accounting machines, code in RPG

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-30 Thread Joel C. Ewing
g [jce.ebe...@cox.net] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 1:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") An IBM 407 control board was the largest of that on any of the plug board machines I ever used, probably at least 24" x 24" (columns numbered

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-30 Thread Warren Brown
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 8:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") On Sun, 29 May

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-30 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 30 May 2022 10:33:23 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: > >As a side note, Richard Feynman described using a room for of EAM equipment to >do calculation for the Manhattan Project. > Imagine debugging. Code Reviews. Comments on sticky notes. -- gil

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-30 Thread Seymour J Metz
] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 8:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") On Sun, 29 May 2022 17:11:33 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >I have never programmed a Tab mac

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-30 Thread Robin Vowels
On 2022-05-30 20:33, Seymour J Metz wrote: I've only seen a 407; did the boards for the other 40x machines have the same form factor? You could open the door an wire the board without removing it; I can't imagine wanting to do so. When a minor change was required to the wiring, the could be

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-30 Thread Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Joel C. Ewing [jce.ebe...@cox.net] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 1:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") An IBM 407 control board was t

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-29 Thread Joel C. Ewing
An IBM 407 control board was the largest of that on any of the plug board machines I ever used, probably at least 24" x 24" (columns numbered 1 -80 and rows numbered A - BL).   A Google search for "407 plug board" will find several pictures (but not all for 407s).  One picture shows that the

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-29 Thread Charles Mills
BM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") I've used a mechanical Marchant calculator, but the 407 used relays. The boards for tabulators were a lot heavier than the boards for other EAMs, e.g., interpreters. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.)

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-29 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 29 May 2022 17:11:33 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >I have never programmed a Tab machine but here is what I know. > >The addition and so forth was purely mechanical. Anyone remember old-fashioned >mechanical adding machines? Picture a wheel with ten cogs on it numbered 0 >through 9.

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-29 Thread Seymour J Metz
Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org] Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 8:11 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") I have never programmed a Tab machine but here is what I know. The addition and so forth

Re: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-29 Thread Charles Mills
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 5:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Tabulating Machines (was "... z114") I have never programmed a Tab machine but here is what I know. The addition and so forth was purely mechanical. Anyone remember old-fashioned

Tabulating Machines (was "... z114")

2022-05-29 Thread Charles Mills
I have never programmed a Tab machine but here is what I know. The addition and so forth was purely mechanical. Anyone remember old-fashioned mechanical adding machines? Picture a wheel with ten cogs on it numbered 0 through 9. Let's say it is indicating 5. If you turn it three clicks it is now