On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:29:12 -0600, David G. Yeager wrote:
>I don't think I've posted to this list in some time. Usually I can't take
>the heat. But you were all so nice to they guy applying maintenance to his
>running system, so I figured to give it another shot before I drop off the
>gri
I don't think I've posted to this list in some time. Usually I can't take the
heat. But you were all so nice to they guy applying maintenance to his running
system, so I figured to give it another shot before I drop off the grid.
Asking the author of the latest IBM red paper about it, it
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:37:12 -0600, Andrew Metcalfe
wrote:
>Hi
>
>I am reviewing our (very old) definitions in COUPLExx for signalling
>(MAXMSG/CLASSDEF etc.).
>
>Is there any recent documentation available as a guide. I have seen the White
>Paper "Parallel Sysplex Performance:XCF Performance
Hi,
I'm not aware of anything more recent. The principles and
methodology still apply. The throughput and response times are better
these days than what is indicated in the charts. Resolving any issues
raised by the z/OS Health Checker will go a long way towards ensuring that
your config
Hi
I am reviewing our (very old) definitions in COUPLExx for signalling
(MAXMSG/CLASSDEF etc.).
Is there any recent documentation available as a guide. I have seen the White
Paper "Parallel Sysplex Performance:XCF Performance Considerations (Version
3.1)" from 2006, but I wondered if there is
