Thanks all.
My 64-bit to 31-bit shim assembles just peachy but the linker thinks
it's a 31-bit animal.
Is there something other than AMODE 64 to tell the linker "yes, this
really is AMODE(64)"?
Does it matter of it's driven from USS instead of batch?
Thanks.
-- R; <><
On 04/27/16
with HLL | 64-bit to 31-bit
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:45:06 -0400, Rick Troth wrote:
>How should I call a 31-bit routine from a 64-bit routine? Obviously the
>64-bit routine will have had to allocate all its storage below the bar.
>But what about linkage? In assembler, it's pretty well d
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:45:06 -0400, Rick Troth wrote:
>How should I call a 31-bit routine from a 64-bit routine? Obviously the
>64-bit routine will have had to allocate all its storage below the bar.
>But what about linkage? In assembler, it's pretty well documented. What
>about higher level
,
tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rick Troth
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 9:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: mixed AMODE with HLL | 64-bit to 31
How should I call a 31-bit routine from a 64-bit routine? Obviously the
64-bit routine will have had to allocate all its storage below the bar.
But what about linkage? In assembler, it's pretty well documented. What
about higher level languages? To be specific, I have a chunk of C code
that
