> Did you mean REXX the "lame" horse? :) Only joking! I was reading
> about the new "z/OS client web enablement toolkit" which comes with a
> REXX API for HTTP requests and a JSON
> serializer/parser
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieac100/ieac1-c
6 PM, David W Noon
<0000013a910fd252-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:25 +, Allan Staller
(allan.stal...@hcl.com) wrote about "Re: too true: Vulture Central on
"the next big thing"." (in
):
My understanding (albeit limited) is that O-O is mo
t; Object-oriented design is not easy to do well. It's quite often done
> > > > > > badly. When it's good, it's very good, but... (you know the rest).
> > > > > >
> > > > > I totally agree it's easy to do badly. But then again it&
over inheritance, in fact never use inheritance unless using abstract
base classes. Program to an interface not an implementation, use design
patterns etc, etc.
sas
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:06 PM, David W Noon
<013a910fd252-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:
. (you know the rest).
>>>>
>>> I totally agree it's easy to do badly. But then again it's easy to do
>>> well. All the lessons were learned back in the 90s. Prefer composition
>>> over inheritance, in fact never use inheritance unless using abstract
t 4:06 PM, David W Noon
<013a910fd252-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:25 +0000, Allan Staller
(allan.stal...@hcl.com) wrote about "Re: too true: Vulture Central on
"the next big thing"." (in
):
My understanding (albeit limited) is that
t; > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:06 PM, David W Noon
> > <0000013a910fd252-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:25 +, Allan Staller
> > > (allan.stal...@hcl.com) wrote about "Re: too true: Vulture Central on
> > > "the next
mentation, use design
patterns etc, etc.
sas
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:06 PM, David W Noon
<013a910fd252-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:25 +, Allan Staller
(allan.stal...@hcl.com) wrote about "Re: too true: Vulture Central on
"the next
> On Oct 20, 2017, at 1:24 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>
> I can relate to this article even though I'm an ancient fart. O-O never made
> much sense to me, but confess that I never really dug into it either. When I
> got into this biz in the late 70s, the hot thing was Structured Programming.
stal...@hcl.com) wrote about "Re: too true: Vulture Central on
> "the next big thing"." (in
> ):
>
>> My understanding (albeit limited) is that O-O is modular programming with the
>> concept of "inheritance" added.
>
> There is consider
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:25 +, Allan Staller
(allan.stal...@hcl.com) wrote about "Re: too true: Vulture Central on
"the next big thing"." (in
):
> My understanding (albeit limited) is that O-O is modular programming with the
> concept of "inheritance" add
true: Vulture Central on "the next big thing".
My understanding (albeit limited) is that O-O is modular programming with the
concept of "inheritance" added.
I am not sure if SP caused modular or vice-versa.
inson
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 1:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: too true: Vulture Central on "the next big thing".
I can relate to this article even though I'm an ancient fart. O-O never made
much sense to me, but confess that I never really dug into it either.
mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 4:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):too true: Vulture Central on "the next big thing".
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/10/20/whats_the_real_point_of_being_a_dev_its_saving_manage
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:36 AM, David Crayford wrote:
> Bit old hat really! Isn't the next big thing functional programming with
> immutable objects and pipelines? OO is already the dominant paradigm but
> the shift is towards functional to make use of parallel processing on
> multi-core machine
Bit old hat really! Isn't the next big thing functional programming with
immutable objects and pipelines? OO is already the dominant paradigm but
the shift is towards functional to make use of parallel processing on
multi-core machines. I remember how mind bending it was trying to get my
head a
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:58:11 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/10/20/whats_the_real_point_of_being_a_dev_its_saving_management_from_themselves/
>
We saw it coming...
Down in the trenches where I was, no programmer believed that the future
would become O-O.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/10/20/whats_the_real_point_of_being_a_dev_its_saving_management_from_themselves/
--
I just child proofed my house.
But the kids still manage to get in.
Maranatha! <><
John McKown
--
For IBM-M
18 matches
Mail list logo
