Re: performance question

Title: performance question Tom, although I couldn't open the stuff you tried to provide in your append, the data you sent me by separate mail gave me the required information to tell what's wrong: - Your RESET specifications are fine. This isevidenced by the report headers From

[Fwd: A billion, anyone?]

FYI. A billion seconds...wow DJ Original Message Subject: A billion, anyone? Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:57:10 +0100 From: Mike Cowlishaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Rexx Language Association [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm celebrating a billion seconds as

Re: New z9 models

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/z9bc/ http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/z9ec/ And for those of us who are old enough to remember, this does not derive from BC Mode (S/360) or EC Mode (S/370)! IBM System z9 EC Enterprise Class (formerly IBM System z9 109) IBM System z9 BC Business Class You can

Re: New z9 models

Well, yes I am old enough to remember...thanks for bringing that point up, Jim:-) I thought the z9-109 was the follow on to the z990 DJ Jim Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/z9bc/ http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/z9ec/ And for those of us who are old

Re: New z9 models

I thought the z9-109 was the follow on to the z990 Dave: z9-109 was renamed today to z9 EC. In addition to the new name, there are now subcapacity models of the z9 S08 (4 different speeds on the 1 to 8 way models of the z9 EC) and other enhancements in common with the z9 BC. Jim

Re: New z9 models

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/z9bc/ http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/z9ec/ So when do we get the Economy Plus class with no in-flight meal, a choice of dumb Hollywood movies and even less legroom? Neat hardware, but who names these things? 8-( Magic Box II, begum. -- db

Re: New z9 models

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:47:16AM -0400, Jim Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And for those of us who are old enough to remember, this does not derive from BC Mode (S/360) or EC Mode (S/370)! How about the ASCII bit, which Linux would find helpful. :) -- May the LORD God bless you

Re: [Fwd: A billion, anyone?]

Wow. 32.48862897985707 years with one company. That is really something. Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 6:26 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject:

Re: [Fwd: A billion, anyone?]

Richard, How did you get that number of years? My calculator (KCalc, on linux) gave me only: 31.68808781402895023530941198686150528374 years. (1e9/60, /60, /24, 365.25) Did I do something wrong? Shimon On 27 Apr 2006 at 8:54, Schuh, Richard wrote: Wow. 32.48862897985707 years with one

Re: New z9 models

That was so long ago that I had forgotten ... :) Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:52 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject:Re: New z9 models

Re: [Fwd: A billion, anyone?]

I probably did something wrong. With my hands, I mistype frequently and must have done so this time Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shimon Lebowitz Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:08 AM To:

Re: [Fwd: A billion, anyone?]

So my years are shorter than yours :) That explains why I don't feel my age. Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Nielsen Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:03 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

Re: New z9 models

On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:22:44 -0400, Richards.Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] om wrote: Neale, What about this one? PAV support and more for z/VM 5.2! http://www.ibm.com/isource/cgi-bin/goto?it=usa_annredon=206-084 That announcement keeps talking about the System z environment. New ter minology? What's