Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Has anyone else seen anything like this, or even have a plausible =
explanation for it?
I see Windows do this occasionally...
...phsiii (ducking and hiding from the brickbats)
What services exist to build dependencies for things
like COPY files or MACROs, including inner MACROs
within inner MACROs?
The idea behind 'make' has always been a good one,
but I never liked maintaining dependencies manually.
Richard Corak
Hi,
I am at a disaster recovery planning site right now. Running z/VM 5.2.0 Service
Level 0601 2nd level. We have been getting a PRG004 hard abend and it appears
from looking at IBM Service Link this has to do with APAR VM63987 and there is
a fix for z/VM 5.2, namely UM31750 since it is seems
It seems to have worked for me:
SRD:
1,1. ORDEROrder PTFs
Fix ID . . .,UM31750_,Single fix, electronic delivery
(Fix may be delivered compacted or
uncompacted)
Type the appropriate information, then press Enter.
Shipping medium . . . . . . . .
I hope you don't hear from me again on strange results. I have used SHUTDOWN
REIPL many times, both on 2nd level systems and on the real iron and nothing
like this has ever happened before (or since - I have tried a few times on 2nd
level to see if it would repeat).
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Don't understand. Yesterday I ordered VSE PTFs and had no problem. I still get
There are no valid PTF(s) in this order
Maybe just put in a call or try on another fix.
Thanks,
Mike
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Stracka, James (GTI)
Sent:
Submitted a feedback, they were able to replicate, checking with dev
team now,
Richard Feldman
Senior IT Architect
Kelly, Douglas / Westfair Foods Ltd.
Ph:(403)291-6339
Greetings,
I have 2 TCP/IP stacks set up, one for the client and one for us. I have setup
an SMTP server for each stack and the clients one is working fine.
However, mine is not working.
The IP address I have specified as IPMAILERADDRESS I can communicate with it
from my CMS account and
Make sure you disable DNS for your second SMTP server, either by
providing a TCPIP PROFILE that does not have NSINTERADDR statements or
using the new configuration support in the SMTP config file to force
traffic to go to the IPMAILERADDRESS entry.
The IP address I have specified as
On Tuesday, 11/14/2006 at 03:03 EST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 2 TCP/IP stacks set up, one for the client and one for us. I have
setup
an SMTP server for each stack and the clients one is working fine.
However, mine is not working.
The IP address I have specified as
Ok , I tried IPMAILERADDR ALL and I got
DTCRUN1011I Server started at 15:54:40 on 14 Nov 2006 (Tuesday)
DTCRUN1011I Running SMTP
DTCSMT1214E Invalid IPMailer Address Specified: ALL
I tried SMSG server LISTMAIL ALL
and I get :
smsg smtpc
Sorry , did the command under user TCPMAINT and I get :
smsg smtpc listmail all
Ready;
* From SMTPC: Total pieces of mail in process: 1
This must be an older release of SMTP and/or VM.
Comment out the NSINTERADDR line entirely (14.0.0.0 is a historical
variant of 127.0.0.1 and is not equal to no name service at all) and put
the IPMAILERADDR back to the IP address of the mail server where you
want all the mail to go. In older
q cplevel
z/VM Version 5 Release 2.0, service level 0601 (64-bit)
Generated at 2006-02-13 11:45:25 EST
IPL at 2006-11-09 02:54:48 EST
mike Ready;
Drat -- just saw this. The idea I suggested will still work, though. If
it does, then you know that that's the problem.
On Tuesday, 11/14/2006 at 04:18 EST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DTCRUN1011I Server started at 15:54:40 on 14 Nov 2006 (Tuesday)
DTCRUN1011I Running SMTP
DTCSMT1214E Invalid IPMailer Address Specified: ALL
Please see my post from June 21 of this year.
15 matches
Mail list logo
