On Monday, 07/09/2007 at 10:30 AST, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Alan Altmark wrote:
I have some assembler code that can run with C or Pascal (called prior
to
entering the real module). I put in a WXTRN for CEESTART and
VSPASCAL
in order to figure out whether
On Monday, 07/09/2007 at 10:30 AST, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
10:30 AST? Alaska Standard Time? You're in Alaska, Alan? If so, why bothe
r
to log in?
I think Atlantic Standard Time would make more sense...but still...why
bother to log in? :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 07/10/2007
07:06:19 AM:
On Monday, 07/09/2007 at 10:30 AST, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom,
Are you sure SPEDIT lets you look at an open/active spool? I am on
version 4.023 of the software. I can look at other users spool files as
long as you have CLASS D. But if someone already has the spool file open
in SPEDIT it is not available or seen in the spool queues. The SPEDIT
Jim,
I don't have SPEDIT here and it has been a few years since I have used it
and that was probably on a VM/ESA system, but I am sure I could look at
spool files that were in the 'create' state. I don't remember about viewing
a file that is already being viewed by someone else. If I remember
10:30 AST? Alaska Standard Time? You're in Alaska, Alan? If so, why
bothe
r
to log in?
No, that'd be Alan Standard Time. You know, the time scale when you're
in that meeting with random vendor weenies that never seems to end? It's
the time to argue about architectural details, and plan
On Tuesday, 07/10/2007 at 09:06 EST, Alan Ackerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, 07/09/2007 at 10:30 AST, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
10:30 AST? Alaska Standard Time? You're in Alaska, Alan? If so, why
bother
to log in?
No,
In our case, the third party backup was suspect because of the corrupted
catalog blocks. The SFS guru at the Support Center suggested that the
UNLOAD/RELOAD after zapping the blocks in error was the only reliable
way to recover. We agreed after discussing the situation with him.
Regards,
Richard
AST is actually Altmark Standard Time. Not to be confused with CST,
which of course is Chuckie Standard Time.
Alan Ackerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
07/10/2007 10:06 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
In our case, the third party backup was suspect because of the
corrupted
catalog blocks. The SFS guru at the Support Center suggested that the
UNLOAD/RELOAD after zapping the blocks in error was the only reliable
way to recover. We agreed after discussing the situation with him.
Makes sense
Hmmm. Then it's Domino's Almost or About Standard Time?
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.
Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Maybe Arbitrary Standard Time
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:56 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [OT] How to determine if running as
Schuh, Richard wrote:
Maybe Arbitrary Standard Time
Making PST = Proprietary Standard Time
:-)
Sorry... but I like oxymorons, and this fit sooo well. :-)
To paraphrase Will Rogers, I never met an oxymoron that I didn't like.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Russell
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:30 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [OT]
Hello!
I see no one, outside of myself has thought it should also be Anarchist
Standard Time.
Youd be surprised how many people complain to my ISP's support locations
regarding the time shown on the web mail screens not looking like something
all of us understand.
It took me a long while to
The problem is that I may eventually need to do a ThreadCreate (note
Multitasking CMS call, not POSIX pthread_create) or EventTrap call, but
not initially. It seemed pretty ugly to me to have to create a thread
just to decide if I was running as a true MT CMS app or not. Not
providing a call to
I am trying to send a text file containing smtp headers and text from z/VM
to my z/OS system so that my z/OS SMTP server will pick up the file and
deliver it as e-mail.
It is working with one slight issue - the file is arriving in the z/OS
system and having carriage control inserted somewhere.
It is likely the lpr command which is adding carriage control. You
could try lying to it and specify cc rather than nocc in its
options. VM print operations consistently add carriage control when you
tell them the file being printed has none. After all, they believe
their output is going to an
Mike - thanks. I changed the NOCC to CC and got the same results.
I don't have SMTP configured on z/VM so this is easier (if it would work).
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering
Lionel:
Firstly, the following is from the VM TCP/IP HELP screen for LPR:
NOCC is the default for all files except those with a file type of
LISTING or LIST3820, in which case CC is the default.
The above is regarding the FOREIGN side. But tell me - does,
indeed,
20 matches
Mail list logo
