Ray,
You mention number of usable NPIV subchannels are subject to the switch
limitations.
Are switch limitations what the IBM Redbook is referencing when it says don't
use more than 32 subchannels per physical channel in NPIV mode?
With the Brocade switch I could use 255 subchannels in NPIV
SMI-S provides a standard management API to make tool building easier.
This is an interesting statement. Would there be interest in a CMS-based SMI-S
library to enable building tools to automate this sort of stuff, and would IBM
integrate it if one was available? Seems to be a good
The zoning and access control isn't going to go away just because CP is
involved.
Correct, but you don't have to do it as frequently, which is the point. There
are too many places in the world where this stuff is done by hand by people
with mouses. A lot of people like the EDEV approach
On Dec 9, 2007 11:08 PM, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you really suggesting inserting CP into the middle of SCSI I/O in
order to create FC minidisks? If so, that requirement needs to be made
with bold underscored italics to get attention. The current thinking is
that guests
Paul, Please ensure you have Perfkit APAR VM64223 applied. We have just
closed this and there were some concerns in the Storage reporting area(s)
.
Please see the APAR error conslusion for details.
For PERFKIT R520 you will get the accumulated Perfkit COR when ordering
the UM32224 PTF.
For
I'd argue that VM needs to provide a virtual analogue to a SAN switch, just
as you currently provide the VSWITCH for data
networking connectivity. IF that were the case, and VM implemented the SMI
standard interconnects with external switches,
then this problem goes away and we all live
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
12/10/2007 08:33:38 AM:
Ray,
You mention number of usable NPIV subchannels are subject to the
switch limitations.
Are switch limitations what the IBM Redbook is referencing when it
says don't use more than 32 subchannels per
Thanks - We are not seeing an abend, but it would not hurt to get the
PTF installed and see what happens.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Lunsford
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:10 AM
To:
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
12/10/2007 10:50:40 AM:
SMI-S provides a standard management API to make tool building easier.
This is an interesting statement. Would there be interest in a CMS-
based SMI-S library to enable building tools to automate this
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Alan Altmark wrote:
Why is it important that VM manage the storage? Why can't give me a disk
xxx GB in size be sent to the SAN fabric directly instead of to VM? I
mean, you still have to send the give me a disk request to the SAN in
order to provision the primordial pool
Greetings- here's your reminder :-)
Just a reminder that the final 2007 Linux on System z Live Virtual
Class is:
Tuesday, Dec 11th at 11:00 AM ET.
There is no charge to participate in these technical education sessions.
You don't have to pre-register, but if you haven't participated
On Monday, 12/10/2007 at 10:52 EST, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SMI-S provides a standard management API to make tool building
easier.
This is an interesting statement. Would there be interest in a CMS-based
SMI-S
library to enable building tools to automate this sort of
I have been out of using pipes for too long.
I need to process a file (parsing the data) but 1st I need to
delete all records from the input stream longer than a certain
length. How do I do this in pipes?
Jim
Isn't CHOP the stage you are looking for?
/Tom Kern
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:46:09 -0500, Jim Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been out of using pipes for too long.
I need to process a file (parsing the data) but 1st I need to
delete all records from the input stream
If the length were 80 bytes and you really want to delete records of 81
or more bytes, use ... | nlocate 81 | ...'
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Kern
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 12:56 PM
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
12/10/2007 03:08:00 PM:
Now, if only all the storage controllers out there would implement SMI-S
interfaces...
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
We can't hide behind that excuse. A quick google shows IBM storage,
On Monday, 12/10/2007 at 12:15 EST, Raymond Higgs/Poughkeepsie/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
12/10/2007
10:50:40 AM:
SMI-S provides a standard management API to make tool building
easier.
This is an interesting
Are blocks of VDISK used anywhere in the CP Monitor Data?
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message
Used or reported? Try the ESAVDSK Vdisk Analysis report.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VDISK blocks used
I forgot to mention, ESAVDSK is under the Main Storage heading.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 2:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VDISK blocks
Marcy,
From http://www.vm.ibm.com/pubs/mon530/index.html, I see Domain 0 Record 7
has a field:
56 38 Unsigned 4 SYTSHS_QDGSYSCATotal number of currently
The ESASTR1 (Storage use), ESAASPC (Address SPace), and ESAVDSK (Virtual DIsk) all should
show this information.
Mark Wheeler wrote:
Marcy,
From http://www.vm.ibm.com/pubs/mon530/index.html, I see Domain 0 Record 7
has a field:
Hello,
Yes, I want to talk about lock file and VDISK in VM with VSE´s under it.
I have 04 VSE´s with diferent CPUID´s defined into $asiproc.proc, but no
one comes up with correct $iplvsex.proc and $$jclvx.proc. All of then
goes up with $iplesa and $$jclesa procs. (standard from vse install).
I opened a SHARE requirement for a change in VSWITCH authorization
(implicit authorization I guess is what Alan called it :)
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must
On Monday, 12/10/2007 at 06:46 EST, Carlos A. Bodra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember that was a chapter into a VSE book (or VM) that gives a
cookbook for run this configuration, but my mind isn´t so good now!!
So I need to ask for some hints. OK I know I´m doing something wrong,
but I
25 matches
Mail list logo
