On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Quay, Jonathan (IHG)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We found a bug in CP minidisk cacheing that would lock up our system. We
turn off MDC at the device level in the system configuration file for our
guest operating system minidisks using RDEV TYPE DASD MDC
IBM should have been able to tell you that the instruction set is different on
an IFL that on a standard LPAR than runs zOS, CICS, VTAM, etc.
--- On Fri, 4/25/08, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VTAM on an IFL?
To:
We have recently discovered that HLASM V1R5.0 is now *required*
to assemble some of the components of z/VM 5.3 CP ... in
particular some that have mods needed by our V/Seg product.
I discovered this by inadvertently being accessed to HLASM
V1R4.0 while attempting to run my automated
Jim,
It's not my/CA's requirement, it's yours/IBM's ...
CA's V/Seg has mods to CSECTs such as HCPNSS, HCPNSI, HCPNSP, etc. for
AUDIT and name substitution (alias) functions. It's the HCPxxx pieces
(not the VSPxxx pieces) that won't assemble.
Nonetheless ... thanks for the info. I keep
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 9:58 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], william JANULIN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBM should have been able to tell you that the instruction set is different
on an IFL that on a standard LPAR than runs zOS, CICS, VTAM, etc.
Yes, and no. Compared to a CP, an IFL has
Greetings Gurus,
I need to add a line in the Profile TCPIP file to point to port 2323 as secure.
Here is the line and the question follows:
2323 TCP INTCLIEN SECURE The title of the certificate i want to use for
SSL to -PLEASE the dear AUDITORS ;TELNET SERVER
The name of the
Which brings up a different tangent
With the IBM z10, you can mix standard and IFL engines in the same LPAR.
So, if you put all your engines in the same LPAR, what does that do to
licensing of 390 software that can also run on an IFL?
And then on the Linux side, would you then get charged
On Wednesday, 04/23/2008 at 10:41 EDT, Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does it make a difference that Hipersockets are real devices dedicated
to the
z/OS guest and the OSA connection is a VSWITCH? The OSA connection on
the
VSWITCH works, the real Hipersockets do not.
Sorry if I
On Friday, 04/25/2008 at 08:33 EDT, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We requested the 'special quote' when we first looked at purchasing a
z890. It took quite a while to get a simple 'no' as the answer. We also
requested RSCS, ISPF and Callup. All were rejected.
Well, RSCS is a feature of
On Saturday, 04/26/2008 at 09:59 EDT, william JANULIN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBM should have been able to tell you that the instruction set is
different on
an IFL that on a standard LPAR than runs zOS, CICS, VTAM, etc.
Bill, IFLs are not an impediment to running VM/VTAM.
Alan Altmark
z/VM
We wanted the full-featured RSCS 3.2 that we were (are) running to
communicate with z/OS, so that important data (erep, monitor,
accounting, backup jobs) could be transfered to z/OS via NJE for
processing. We have shrunk enough that VM data just isn't worth anything
anymore. None of the bosses
On Saturday, 04/26/2008 at 09:33 EDT, Suleiman Shahin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings Gurus,
I need to add a line in the Profile TCPIP file to point to port 2323 as
secure.
Here is the line and the question follows:
2323 TCP INTCLIEN SECURE The title of the certificate i want
12 matches
Mail list logo
