Re: z/VM SSL Usage

2008-10-23 Thread Alan Ackerman
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:50:31 -0400, Bill Bitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro te: >The z/VM Development Lab is looking for some information regarding >z/VM SSL server usage (this is the SSL for use with the VM TCP/IP >stack). If you currently use the z/VM SSL server or plan to use it >in the next few ye

Re: Migration from 5.2 to 5.4

2008-10-23 Thread Mike Walter
Well, I'm certainly not going to argue with Carol! But the "Description" column on the MIGR51D EXEC could have been a little clearer, maybe something like: Description of Previous Components -- Mike Walter Hewitt Associates Any opinions expressed herein are mi

Re: Migration from 5.2 to 5.4

2008-10-23 Thread Carol Everitt
David, From Appendix C in the Guide for automated Installation and Servic e, an action code of "D" means "Do Not Migrate". An action code of "M" means "Migrate". For the information that you have included, I would interpret the output as suggesting that NCP is flagged to be migrated fro m the

Re: Migration from 5.2 to 5.4

2008-10-23 Thread Dean, David (I/S)
Ready(00099); T=0.14/0.15 13:42:54 listfile migr51d * * (iso FILENAME FILETYPE FM FORMAT LRECL RECS BLOCKS DATE TIME MIGR51D EXEC W2 V 63146 2 2008-06-10 07:25:47 MIGR51D HELPINST W1 V 71114 2 2003-05-28 08:15:06 Ready; T=0.

Re: Migration from 5.2 to 5.4

2008-10-23 Thread Dean, David (I/S)
I apologize, I may have posted twice. David Dean Information Systems *bcbstauthorized* From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Walter Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 1:39 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subjec

Re: Migration from 5.2 to 5.4

2008-10-23 Thread Mike Walter
Since thus far there no replies I'll take a stab at helping. Could you issue and post the replies to the following commands: LISTFILE MIGR51D * * (ISO LISTFILE MIGRATE $RESTART * (ISO TYPE MIGRATE $RESTART * Q DISK Mike Walter Hewitt Associates Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do

Re: Migration from 5.2 to 5.4

2008-10-23 Thread Dean, David (I/S)
Ok, I am to the point of running MIGR51. Here is my first screen. It looks to me like it wants to install 5.2 components instead of 5.4. I have accessed a minidisk (L) as 151D with a copy of the OLD 51D. When MIGR51D asks me for the existing system's mode I choose L. Help? Thanks. M N

Re: Migration from 5.2 to 5.4

2008-10-23 Thread Dean, David (I/S)
Ok, I am to the point of running MIGR51. Here is my first screen. It looks to me like it wants to install 5.2 components instead of 5.4. I have accessed a minidisk (L) as 151D with a copy of the OLD 51D. When MIGR51D asks me for the existing system's mode I choose L. Help? Thanks. M N

Re: z/VM JAVA VM

2008-10-23 Thread David Boyes
> >Would be a clever way to actually make the zAAP specialty engine useful > >to a z/VM system. Someone would have to write a Java operating system, > >and I don't know if the zAAPs can actually do I/O. Still, SET MACHINE > >JAVA would be interesting. > Except that the zAAP would only be relevant i

Re: z/VM JAVA VM

2008-10-23 Thread Tom Duerbusch
That is an easy one.software charges. To my knowledge, there are no software charges for zAAPs or any other speciality engine other than the IFL. So two IFLs, the software is charged for two engines. One IFL and one zAAP, the software charge is for one engine. Of course the free hardware up

Re: Very Slow Linux Running Second Level z/VM

2008-10-23 Thread Phil Smith III
Rob van der Heij wrote: >We recently looked at data from a similar configuration. The data was >sufficient to explain why their Linux server ran about 10 times as >slow as they anticipated. A factor of 3 could be helped by proper >configuration, the rest was overhead in V/SIE basically. >Linux is u